Hubbry Logo
Alexander the GreatAlexander the GreatMain
Open search
Alexander the Great
Community hub
Alexander the Great
logo
16 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Alexander the Great
Alexander the Great
from Wikipedia

Key Information

Alexander III of Macedon (Ancient Greek: Ἀλέξανδρος, romanizedAléxandros; 20/21 July 356 BC – 10/11 June 323 BC), most commonly known as Alexander the Great,[c] was a king of the ancient Greek kingdom of Macedon.[d] He succeeded his father Philip II to the throne in 336 BC at the age of 20 and spent most of his ruling years conducting a lengthy military campaign throughout Western Asia, Central Asia, parts of South Asia, and Egypt. By the age of 30, he had created one of the largest empires in history, stretching from Greece to northwestern India.[2] He was undefeated in battle and is widely considered to be one of history's greatest and most successful military commanders.[3][4][5]

Until the age of 16, Alexander was tutored by Aristotle. In 335 BC, shortly after his assumption of kingship over Macedon, he campaigned in the Balkans and reasserted control over Thrace and parts of Illyria before marching on the city of Thebes, which was subsequently destroyed in battle. Alexander then led the League of Corinth, and used his authority to launch the pan-Hellenic project envisaged by his father, assuming leadership over all Greeks in their conquest of Persia.[6][7]

In 334 BC, he invaded the Achaemenid Persian Empire and began a series of campaigns that lasted for 10 years. Following his conquest of Asia Minor, Alexander broke the power of Achaemenid Persia in a series of decisive battles, including those at Issus and Gaugamela; he subsequently overthrew Darius III and conquered the Achaemenid Empire in its entirety.[e] After the fall of Persia, the Macedonian Empire held a vast swath of territory between the Adriatic Sea and the Indus River. Alexander endeavored to reach the "ends of the world and the Great Outer Sea" and invaded India in 326 BC, achieving an important victory over Porus, an ancient Indian king of present-day Punjab, at the Battle of the Hydaspes. Due to the mutiny of his homesick troops, he eventually turned back at the Beas River and later died in 323 BC in Babylon, the city of Mesopotamia that he had planned to establish as his empire's capital. Alexander's death left unexecuted an additional series of planned military and mercantile campaigns that would have begun with a Greek invasion of Arabia. In the years following his death, a series of civil wars broke out across the Macedonian Empire, eventually leading to its disintegration at the hands of the Diadochi.

With his death marking the start of the Hellenistic period, Alexander's legacy includes the cultural diffusion and syncretism that his conquests engendered, such as Greco-Buddhism and Hellenistic Judaism. He founded more than twenty cities, with the most prominent being the city of Alexandria in Egypt. Alexander's settlement of Greek colonists and the resulting spread of Greek culture led to the overwhelming dominance of Hellenistic civilization and influence as far east as the Indian subcontinent. The Hellenistic period developed through the Roman Empire into modern Western culture; the Greek language became the lingua franca of the region and was the predominant language of the Byzantine Empire until its collapse in the mid-15th century AD.

Alexander became legendary as a classical hero in the mould of Achilles, featuring prominently in the historical and mythical traditions of both Greek and non-Greek cultures. His military achievements and unprecedented enduring successes in battle made him the measure against which many later military leaders would compare themselves,[f] and his tactics remain a significant subject of study in military academies worldwide.[8] Legends of Alexander's exploits coalesced into the third-century Alexander Romance which, in the premodern period, went through over one hundred recensions, translations, and derivations and was translated into almost every European vernacular and every language of the Islamic world.[9] After the Bible, it was the most popular form of European literature.[10]

Early life

[edit]

Lineage and childhood

[edit]
Archaeological site of Pella, Greece, Alexander's birthplace

Alexander III was born in Pella, the capital of the Kingdom of Macedon,[11] on the sixth day of the ancient Greek month of Hekatombaion, which probably corresponds to 20 July 356 BC (although the exact date is uncertain).[12][13] He was the son of the king of Macedon, Philip II, and his fourth wife, Olympias (daughter of Neoptolemus I, king of Epirus).[14][g] Although Philip had seven or eight wives, Olympias was his principal wife for some time, likely because she gave birth to Alexander.[15]

Roman medallion depicting Olympias, Alexander's mother

Several legends surround Alexander's birth and childhood.[16] According to the ancient Greek biographer Plutarch, on the eve of the consummation of her marriage to Philip, Olympias dreamed that her womb was struck by a thunderbolt that caused a flame to spread "far and wide" before dying away. Sometime after the wedding, Philip is said to have seen himself, in a dream, securing his wife's womb with a seal engraved with a lion's image.[17] Plutarch offered a variety of interpretations for these dreams: that Olympias was pregnant before her marriage, indicated by the sealing of her womb; or that Alexander's father was Zeus. Ancient commentators were divided about whether the ambitious Olympias promulgated the story of Alexander's divine parentage, variously claiming that she had told Alexander, or that she dismissed the suggestion as impious.[17]

On the day Alexander was born, Philip was preparing a siege on the city of Potidea on the peninsula of Chalcidice. That same day, Philip received news that his general Parmenion had defeated the combined Illyrian and Paeonian armies and that his horses had won at the Olympic Games. It was also said that on this day, the Temple of Artemis in Ephesus, one of the Seven Wonders of the World, burnt down. This led Hegesias of Magnesia to say that it had burnt down because Artemis was away, attending the birth of Alexander.[18] Such legends may have emerged when Alexander was king, and possibly at his instigation, to show that he was superhuman and destined for greatness from conception.[16]

In his early years, Alexander was raised by a nurse, Lanike, sister of Alexander's future general Cleitus the Black. Later in his childhood, Alexander was tutored by the strict Leonidas, a relative of his mother, and by Lysimachus of Acarnania.[19] Alexander was raised in the manner of noble Macedonian youths, learning to read, play the lyre, ride, fight, and hunt.[20] When Alexander was ten years old, a trader from Thessaly brought Philip a horse, which he offered to sell for thirteen talents. The horse refused to be mounted, and Philip ordered it away. Alexander, however, detecting the horse's fear of its own shadow, asked to tame the horse, which he eventually managed.[16] Plutarch stated that Philip, overjoyed at this display of courage and ambition, kissed his son tearfully, declaring: "My boy, you must find a kingdom big enough for your ambitions. Macedon is too small for you", and bought the horse for him.[21] Alexander named it Bucephalas, meaning "ox-head". Bucephalas carried Alexander as far as India. When the animal died (because of old age, according to Plutarch, at age 30), Alexander named a city after him, Bucephala.[22]

Education

[edit]

When Alexander was 13, Philip began to search for a tutor, and considered such academics as Isocrates and Speusippus, the latter offering to resign from his stewardship of the Academy to take up the post. In the end, Philip chose Aristotle and provided the Temple of the Nymphs at Mieza as a classroom. In return for teaching Alexander, Philip agreed to rebuild Aristotle's hometown of Stageira, which Philip had razed, and to repopulate it by buying and freeing the ex-citizens who were slaves, or pardoning those who were in exile.[23]

Mieza was like a boarding school for Alexander and the children of Macedonian nobles, such as Ptolemy, Hephaestion, and Cassander. Many of these students would become his friends and future generals, and are often known as the "Companions". Aristotle taught Alexander and his companions about medicine, philosophy, morals, religion, logic, and art. Under Aristotle's tutelage, Alexander developed a passion for the works of Homer, and in particular the Iliad; Aristotle gave him an annotated copy, which Alexander later carried on his campaigns.[24] Alexander was able to quote Euripides from memory.[25]

In his youth, Alexander was also acquainted with Persian exiles at the Macedonian court, who received the protection of Philip II for several years as they opposed Artaxerxes III.[26][27][28] Among them were Artabazos II and his daughter Barsine, possible future mistress of Alexander, who resided at the Macedonian court from 352 to 342 BC, as well as Amminapes, future satrap of Alexander, and a Persian nobleman named Sisines.[26][29][30][31] This gave the Macedonian court a good knowledge of Persian issues, and may even have influenced some of the innovations in the management of the Macedonian state.[29]

Suda writes that Anaximenes of Lampsacus was one of Alexander's teachers, and that Anaximenes also accompanied Alexander on his campaigns.[32]

Heir of Philip II

[edit]

Regency and ascent of Macedon

[edit]
Philip II of Macedon, Alexander's father

At the age of 16, Alexander's education under Aristotle ended. Philip II had waged war against the Thracians to the north, which left Alexander in charge as regent and heir apparent.[16] During Philip's absence, the Thracian tribe of Maedi revolted against Macedonia. Alexander responded quickly and drove them from their territory. The territory was colonized, and a city, named Alexandropolis, was founded.[33]

Upon Philip's return, Alexander was dispatched with a small force to subdue the revolts in southern Thrace. Campaigning against the Greek city of Perinthus, Alexander reportedly saved his father's life. Meanwhile, the city of Amphissa began to work lands that were sacred to Apollo near Delphi, a sacrilege that gave Philip the opportunity to further intervene in Greek affairs. While Philip was occupied in Thrace, Alexander was ordered to muster an army for a campaign in southern Greece. Concerned that other Greek states might intervene, Alexander made it look as though he was preparing to attack Illyria instead. During this turmoil, the Illyrians invaded Macedonia, only to be repelled by Alexander.[34]

Philip and his army joined his son in 338 BC, and they marched south through Thermopylae, taking it after stubborn resistance from its Theban garrison. They went on to occupy the city of Elatea, only a few days' march from both Athens and Thebes. The Athenians, led by Demosthenes, voted to seek alliance with Thebes against Macedonia. Both Athens and Philip sent embassies to win Thebes's favour, but Athens won the contest.[35] Philip marched on Amphissa (ostensibly acting on the request of the Amphictyonic League), capturing the mercenaries sent there by Demosthenes and accepting the city's surrender. Philip then returned to Elatea, sending a final offer of peace to Athens and Thebes, who both rejected it.[36]

Battle plan from the Battle of Chaeronea

As Philip marched south, his opponents blocked him near Chaeronea, Boeotia. During the ensuing Battle of Chaeronea, Philip commanded the right wing and Alexander the left, accompanied by a group of Philip's trusted generals. According to the ancient sources, the two sides fought bitterly for some time. Philip deliberately commanded his troops to retreat, counting on the untested Athenian hoplites to follow, thus breaking their line. Alexander was the first to break the Theban lines, followed by Philip's generals. Having damaged the enemy's cohesion, Philip ordered his troops to press forward and quickly routed them. With the Athenians lost, the Thebans were surrounded. Left to fight alone, they were defeated.[37]

After the victory at Chaeronea, Philip and Alexander marched unopposed into the Peloponnese, devastating much of Laconia and ejecting the Spartans from various parts of it.[38] At Corinth, Philip established a "Hellenic Alliance" (modelled on the old anti-Persian alliance of the Greco-Persian Wars), which included most Greek city-states except Sparta. Philip was then named Hegemon (often translated as "Supreme Commander") of this league (known by modern scholars as the League of Corinth), and announced his plans to attack the Persian Empire.[39][40]

Exile and return

[edit]

When Philip returned to Pella, he fell in love with and married Cleopatra Eurydice in 338 BC,[41] the niece of his general Attalus.[42] The marriage made Alexander's position as heir less secure, since any son of Cleopatra Eurydice would be a fully Macedonian heir, while Alexander was only half-Macedonian.[43] During the wedding banquet, a drunken Attalus publicly prayed to the gods that the union would produce a legitimate heir.[42]

At the wedding of Cleopatra, whom Philip fell in love with and married, she being much too young for him, her uncle Attalus in his drink desired the Macedonians would implore the gods to give them a lawful successor to the kingdom by his niece. This so irritated Alexander that throwing one of the cups at his head, "You villain," said he, "what, am I then a bastard?" Then Philip, taking Attalus's part, rose up and would have run his son through; but by good fortune for them both, either his over-hasty rage, or the wine he had drunk, made his foot slip, so that he fell down on the floor, at which Alexander reproachfully insulted him: "See there," said he, "the man who makes preparations to pass out of Europe into Asia, overturned in passing from one seat to another."

— Plutarch, describing the feud at Philip's wedding.[44]

In 337 BC, Alexander fled Macedon with his mother, dropping her off with her brother, King Alexander I of Epirus in Dodona, capital of the Molossians.[45] He continued to Illyria[45] where he sought refuge with one or more Illyrian kings, perhaps with Glaucias, and was treated as a guest, despite having defeated them in battle a few years before.[46] However, it appears Philip never intended to disown his politically and militarily trained son.[45] Accordingly, Alexander returned to Macedon after six months due to the efforts of a family friend, Demaratus, who mediated between the two parties.[47]

In the following year, the Persian satrap (governor) of Caria, Pixodarus, offered his eldest daughter to Alexander's half-brother, Philip Arrhidaeus.[45] Olympias and several of Alexander's friends suggested this showed Philip intended to make Arrhidaeus his heir.[45] Alexander reacted by sending an actor, Thessalus of Corinth, to tell Pixodarus that he should not offer his daughter's hand to an illegitimate son, but instead to Alexander. When Philip heard of this, he stopped the negotiations and scolded Alexander for wishing to marry the daughter of a Carian, explaining that he wanted a better bride for him.[45] Philip exiled four of Alexander's friends, Harpalus, Nearchus, Ptolemy and Erigyius, and had the Corinthians bring Thessalus to him in chains.[48]

King of Macedon

[edit]

Accession

[edit]
Pausanias assassinates Philip II, Alexander's father, during his procession into the theatre

In the 24th day of the Macedonian month Dios, which probably corresponds to 25 October 336 BC,[49][50] while at Aegae attending the wedding of his daughter Cleopatra to Olympias's brother, Alexander I of Epirus, Philip was assassinated by the captain of his bodyguards, Pausanias,[h] who, according to Diodorus, was also his lover.[51] As Pausanias tried to escape, he tripped over a vine and was killed by his pursuers, including two of Alexander's companions, Perdiccas and Leonnatus. Alexander was proclaimed king on the spot by the nobles and army at the age of 20.[52][53][54]

Consolidation of power

[edit]

Alexander began his reign by eliminating potential rivals to the throne. He had his cousin, the former Amyntas IV, executed.[55] He also had two Macedonian princes from the region of Lyncestis killed for having been involved in his father's assassination, but spared a third, Alexander Lyncestes. Olympias had Cleopatra Eurydice, and Europa, her daughter by Philip, burned alive. When Alexander learned about this, he was furious. Alexander also ordered the murder of Attalus,[55] who was in command of the advance guard of the army in Asia Minor and Cleopatra's uncle.[56]

Attalus was at that time corresponding with Demosthenes, regarding the possibility of defecting to Athens. Attalus also had severely insulted Alexander, and following Cleopatra's murder, Alexander may have considered him too dangerous to be left alive.[56] Alexander spared Arrhidaeus, who was by all accounts mentally disabled, possibly as a result of poisoning by Olympias.[52][54][57]

News of Philip's death roused many states into revolt, including Thebes, Athens, Thessaly, and the Thracian tribes north of Macedon. When news of the revolts reached Alexander, he responded quickly. Though advised to use diplomacy, Alexander mustered 3,000 Macedonian cavalry and rode south towards Thessaly. He found the Thessalian army occupying the pass between Mount Olympus and Mount Ossa, and ordered his men to ride over Mount Ossa. When the Thessalians awoke the next day, they found Alexander in their rear and promptly surrendered, adding their cavalry to Alexander's force. He then continued south towards the Peloponnese.[58]

Alexander stopped at Thermopylae where he was recognized as the leader of the Amphictyonic League before heading south to Corinth. Athens sued for peace and Alexander pardoned the rebels. The famous encounter between Alexander and Diogenes the Cynic occurred during Alexander's stay in Corinth. When Alexander asked Diogenes what he could do for him, the philosopher disdainfully asked Alexander to stand a little to the side, as he was blocking the sunlight.[59] This reply apparently delighted Alexander who is reported to have said, "But verily, if I were not Alexander, I would like to be Diogenes."[60] At Corinth, Alexander took the title of Hegemon ("leader") and, like Philip, was appointed commander for the coming war against Persia. He also received news of a Thracian uprising.[61]

Balkan campaign

[edit]
The Macedonian phalanx at the "Battle of the Carts" against the Thracians in 335 BC

Before crossing to Asia, Alexander wanted to safeguard his northern borders. In the spring of 335 BC, he advanced to suppress several revolts. Starting from Amphipolis, he travelled east into the country of the "Independent Thracians", and at Mount Haemus, the Macedonian army attacked and defeated the Thracian forces manning the heights.[62] The Macedonians marched into the country of the Triballi and defeated their army near the Lyginus river[63] (a tributary of the Danube). Alexander then marched for three days to the Danube, encountering the Getae tribe on the opposite shore. Crossing the river at night, he surprised them and forced their army to retreat after the first cavalry skirmish.[64]

News then reached Alexander that the Illyrian chieftain Cleitus and King Glaukias of the Taulantii were in open revolt against his authority. Marching west into Illyria, Alexander defeated each in turn, forcing the two rulers to flee with their troops. With these victories, he secured his northern frontier.[65]

Destruction of Thebes

[edit]

While Alexander campaigned north, the Thebans and Athenians rebelled once again. Alexander immediately headed south.[66] While the other cities again hesitated, Thebes decided to fight. The Theban resistance was ineffective and Alexander razed the city and divided its territory between the other Boeotian cities. The end of Thebes cowed Athens, leaving all of Greece temporarily at peace.[66] Alexander then set out on his Asian campaign, leaving Antipater as regent.[67]

Conquest of the Achaemenid Persian Empire

[edit]

Strategy

[edit]

Alexander's invasion of Persia as a whole has been denoted as a supreme example of a "strategic line" of conducting war, a line formed by "the chain of logic that connects operations into a single whole." In his book Strategy, Soviet military officer and theorist Alexander Svechin delineates Alexander's strategic steps. After securing his Greek base and the Balkans by subjugating his political opponents, and securing his army's rear through the conquest of all the Afro-Asian coastline, where the Persian fleet was based and from which it was supplied, Alexander moved to confront directly the Persians. He thus resolved the eternal problem of an army conducting operations deep into enemy territory, Svechin states, in an "exemplary manner."[68]

Asia Minor

[edit]
Map of Alexander's empire and his route
Map
About OpenStreetMaps
Maps: terms of use
900km
559miles
15
Babylon
15 Death of Alexander the Great 10 or 11 June 323 BC
15 Death of Alexander the Great 10 or 11 June 323 BC
14
Malavas
14 Mallian campaign November 326 – February 325 BC
14 Mallian campaign November 326 – February 325 BC
13
Hydaspes
13 Battle of the Hydaspes May 326 BC
13 Battle of the Hydaspes May 326 BC
12
Cophen
12 Cophen campaign May 327 BC – March 326 BC
12 Cophen campaign May 327 BC – March 326 BC
11
Cyropolis
11 Siege of Cyropolis 329 BC Battle of Jaxartes October 329 BC Siege of the Sogdian Rock 327 BC
11 Siege of Cyropolis 329 BC Battle of Jaxartes October 329 BC Siege of the Sogdian Rock 327 BC
10
Persian Gate
10 Battle of the Persian Gate 20 January 330 BC
10 Battle of the Persian Gate 20 January 330 BC
9
Uxians
9 Battle of the Uxian Defile December 331 BC
9 Battle of the Uxian Defile December 331 BC
8
Gaugamela
8 Battle of Gaugamela 1 October 331 BC
8 Battle of Gaugamela 1 October 331 BC
7
Alexandria
7 Foundation of Alexandria 331 BC
7 Foundation of Alexandria 331 BC
6
Gaza
6 Siege of Gaza October 332 BC
6 Siege of Gaza October 332 BC
5
Tyre
5 Siege of Tyre (332 BC) January–July 332 BC
5 Siege of Tyre (332 BC) January–July 332 BC
4
Issus
4 Battle of Issus 334 BC
4 Battle of Issus 334 BC
3
Miletus
3 Siege of Miletus 334 BC Siege of Halicarnassus 334 BC
3 Siege of Miletus 334 BC Siege of Halicarnassus 334 BC
2
Granicus
2 Battle of the Granicus May, 334 BC
2 Battle of the Granicus May, 334 BC
1
Pella

After his victory at the Battle of Chaeronea (338 BC), Philip II began the work of establishing himself as hēgemṓn (Greek: ἡγεμών) of a league which according to Diodorus was to wage a campaign against the Persians for the sundry grievances Greece suffered in 480 and free the Greek cities of the western coast and islands from Achaemenid rule. In 336 he sent Parmenion, Amyntas, Andromenes, Attalus, and an army of 10,000 men into Anatolia to make preparations for an invasion.[69][70] The Greek cities on the western coast of Anatolia revolted until the news arrived that Philip had been murdered and had been succeeded by his young son Alexander. The Macedonians were demoralized by Philip's death and were subsequently defeated near Magnesia by the Achaemenids under the command of the mercenary Memnon of Rhodes.[69][70]

Taking over the invasion project of Philip II, Alexander's army crossed the Hellespont in 334 BC with approximately 48,100 soldiers, 6,100 cavalry, and a fleet of 120 ships with crews numbering 38,000[66] drawn from Macedon and various Greek city states, mercenaries, and feudally raised soldiers from Thrace, Paionia, and Illyria.[71][i] He showed his intent to conquer the entirety of the Persian Empire by throwing a spear into Asian soil and saying he accepted Asia as a gift from the gods. This also showed Alexander's eagerness to fight, in contrast to his father's preference for diplomacy.[66]

After an initial victory against Persian forces at the Battle of the Granicus, Alexander accepted the surrender of the Persian provincial capital and treasury of Sardis; he then proceeded along the Ionian coast, granting autonomy and democracy to the cities. Miletus, held by Achaemenid forces, required a delicate siege operation, with Persian naval forces nearby. Further south, at Halicarnassus, in Caria, Alexander successfully waged his first large-scale siege, eventually forcing his opponents, the mercenary captain Memnon of Rhodes and the Persian satrap of Caria, Orontobates, to withdraw by sea.[72] Alexander left the government of Caria to a member of the Hecatomnid dynasty, Ada, who adopted Alexander.[73]

Alexander Cuts the Gordian Knot by Jean-Simon Berthélemy (1767)

From Halicarnassus, Alexander proceeded into mountainous Lycia and the Pamphylian plain, asserting control over all coastal cities to deny the Persians naval bases. From Pamphylia onwards, the coast held no major ports and Alexander moved inland. At Termessos, Alexander humbled and did not storm the Pisidian city.[74] At the ancient Phrygian capital of Gordium, Alexander "undid" the hitherto unsolvable Gordian Knot, a feat said to await the future "king of Asia".[75] According to the story, Alexander proclaimed that it did not matter how the knot was undone, and hacked it apart with his sword.[76]

The Levant and Syria

[edit]

In spring 333 BC, Alexander crossed the Taurus into Cilicia. After a long pause due to an illness, he marched on towards Syria. Though outmanoeuvered by Darius's significantly larger army, he marched back to Cilicia, where he defeated Darius at Issus. Darius fled the battle, causing his army to collapse, and left behind his wife, his two daughters, his mother Sisygambis, and a fabulous treasure.[77] He offered a peace treaty that included the lands he had already lost, and a ransom of 10,000 talents for his family. Alexander replied that since he was now king of Asia, it was he alone who decided territorial divisions.[78] Alexander proceeded to take possession of Syria, and most of the coast of the Levant.[73] In the following year, 332 BC, he was forced to attack Tyre, which he captured after a long and difficult siege.[79][80] The men of military age were massacred and the women and children sold into slavery.[81]

Egypt

[edit]
Name of Alexander in Egyptian hieroglyphs (written from right to left), c. 332 BC, Egypt. Louvre Museum.

When Alexander destroyed Tyre, most of the towns on the route to Egypt quickly capitulated. However, Alexander was met with resistance at Gaza. The stronghold was heavily fortified and built on a hill, requiring a siege. When "his engineers pointed out to him that because of the height of the mound it would be impossible... this encouraged Alexander all the more to make the attempt".[82] After three unsuccessful assaults, the stronghold fell, but not before Alexander had received a serious shoulder wound. As in Tyre, men of military age were put to the sword, and the women and children were sold into slavery.[83]

Egypt was only one of a large number of territories taken by Alexander from the Persians. After his trip to Siwa, Alexander was crowned in the temple of Ptah at Memphis. It appears that the Egyptian people did not find it disturbing that he was a foreigner – nor that he was absent for virtually his entire reign.[84] Alexander restored the temples neglected by the Persians and dedicated new monuments to the Egyptian gods. In the temple of Luxor, near Karnak, he built a chapel for the sacred barge. During his brief months in Egypt, he reformed the taxation system on the Greek models and organized the military occupation of the country, but in early 331 BC he left for Asia in pursuit of the Persians.[84]

Alexander advanced on Egypt in later 332 BC where he was regarded as a liberator.[85] To legitimize taking power and be recognized as the descendant of the long line of pharaohs, Alexander made sacrifices to the gods at Memphis and went to consult the famous oracle of Amun-Ra at the Siwa Oasis in the Libyan desert,[84] at which he was pronounced the son of the deity Amun.[86] Henceforth, Alexander often referred to Zeus-Ammon as his true father, and after his death, currency depicted him adorned with horns, using the Horns of Ammon as a symbol of his divinity.[87] The Greeks interpreted this message – one that the gods addressed to all pharaohs – as a prophecy.[84]

During his stay in Egypt, he founded Alexandria, which would become the prosperous capital of the Ptolemaic Kingdom after his death.[88] Control of Egypt passed to Ptolemy I (son of Lagos), the founder of the Ptolemaic Dynasty (305–30 BC) after the death of Alexander.[89]

Assyria and Babylonia

[edit]
Entry of Alexander into Babylon by Charles Le Brun (1665)

Leaving Egypt in 331 BC, Alexander marched eastward into Achaemenid Assyria in Upper Mesopotamia (now northern Iraq) and defeated Darius again at the Battle of Gaugamela.[90] Darius once more fled the field, and Alexander chased him as far as Arbela. Gaugamela would be the final and decisive encounter between the two.[91] Darius fled over the mountains to Ecbatana (modern Hamadan) while Alexander captured Babylon.[92]

Babylonian astronomical diaries say that "the king of the world, Alexander" sent his scouts with a message to the people of Babylon before entering the city: "I shall not enter your houses".[93]

Persia

[edit]
Site of the Persian Gate in modern-day Iran; the road was built in the 1990s.

From Babylon, Alexander went to Susa, one of the Achaemenid capitals, and captured its treasury.[92] He sent the bulk of his army to the Persian ceremonial capital of Persepolis via the Persian Royal Road. Alexander himself took selected troops on the direct route to the city. He then stormed the pass of the Persian Gates (in the modern Zagros Mountains) which had been blocked by a Persian army under Ariobarzanes and then hurried to Persepolis before its garrison could loot the treasury.[94]

On entering Persepolis, Alexander allowed his troops to loot the city for several days.[95] Alexander stayed in Persepolis for five months.[96] During his stay, a fire broke out in the eastern palace of Xerxes I and spread to the rest of the city. Possible causes include a drunken accident or deliberate revenge for the burning of the Acropolis of Athens during the Second Persian War by Xerxes;[97] Plutarch and Diodorus allege that Alexander's companion, the hetaera Thaïs, instigated and started the fire. Even as he watched the city burn, Alexander immediately began to regret his decision.[98][99][100] Plutarch claims that he ordered his men to put out the fires[98] but the flames had already spread to most of the city.[98] Curtius claims that Alexander did not regret his decision until the next morning.[98] Plutarch recounts an anecdote in which Alexander pauses and talks to a fallen statue of Xerxes as if it were a live person:

Shall I pass by and leave you lying there because of the expeditions you led against Greece, or shall I set you up again because of your magnanimity and your virtues in other respects?[101]

Fall of the Persian Empire and the East

[edit]
Administrative document from Bactria dated to the seventh year of Alexander's reign (324 BC), bearing the first known use of the "Alexandros" form of his name, Khalili Collection of Aramaic Documents[102]

Alexander then chased Darius, first into Media, and then Parthia.[103] The Persian king no longer controlled his own destiny, and was taken prisoner by Bessus, his Bactrian satrap and kinsman.[104] As Alexander approached, Bessus had his men fatally stab the Great King and then declared himself Darius's successor as Artaxerxes V, before retreating into Central Asia to launch a guerrilla campaign against Alexander.[105] Alexander buried Darius's remains next to his Achaemenid predecessors in a regal funeral.[106] He claimed that, while dying, Darius had named him as his successor to the Achaemenid throne.[107] The Achaemenid Empire is normally considered to have fallen with Darius.[108] However, as basic forms of community life and the general structure of government were maintained and resuscitated by Alexander under his own rule, he, in the words of the Iranologist Pierre Briant "may therefore be considered to have acted in many ways as the last of the Achaemenids."[109]

Alexander viewed Bessus as a usurper and set out to defeat him. This campaign, initially against Bessus, turned into a grand tour of central Asia. Alexander founded a series of new cities, all called Alexandria, including modern Kandahar in Afghanistan, and Alexandria Eschate ("The Furthest") in modern Tajikistan. The campaign took Alexander through Media, Parthia, Aria (West Afghanistan), Drangiana, Arachosia (South and Central Afghanistan), Bactria (North and Central Afghanistan), and Scythia.[110]

In 329 BC, Spitamenes, who held an undefined position in the satrapy of Sogdiana, betrayed Bessus to Ptolemy, one of Alexander's trusted companions, and Bessus was executed.[111] However, at some point later when Alexander was on the Jaxartes dealing with an incursion by a horse nomad army, Spitamenes raised Sogdiana in revolt. Alexander personally defeated the Scythians at the Battle of Jaxartes and immediately launched a campaign against Spitamenes, defeating him in the Battle of Gabai. After the defeat, Spitamenes was killed by his own men, who then sued for peace.[112]

Problems and plots

[edit]
The Killing of Cleitus, by André Castaigne (1898–1899)

During this time, Alexander adopted some elements of Persian dress and customs at his court, notably the custom of proskynesis, either a symbolic kissing of the hand, or prostration on the ground, that Persians showed to their social superiors.[113] This was one aspect of Alexander's broad strategy aimed at securing the aid and support of the Iranian upper classes.[109] The Greeks however regarded the gesture of proskynesis as the province of deities and believed that Alexander meant to deify himself by requiring it. This cost him the sympathies of many of his countrymen, and he eventually abandoned it.[114]

During the long rule of the Achaemenids, the elite positions in many segments of the empire including the central government, the army, and the many satrapies were specifically reserved for Iranians and to a major degree, Persian noblemen.[109] The latter were in many cases additionally connected through marriage alliances with the royal Achaemenid family.[109] This created a problem for Alexander as to whether he had to make use of the various segments and people that had given the empire its solidity and unity for a lengthy period of time.[109] Pierre Briant explains that Alexander realized that it was insufficient to merely exploit the internal contradictions within the imperial system as in Asia Minor, Babylonia or Egypt; he also had to (re)create a central government with or without the support of the Iranians.[109] As early as 334 BC he demonstrated awareness of this, when he challenged incumbent King Darius III "by appropriating the main elements of the Achaemenid monarchy's ideology, particularly the theme of the king who protects the lands and the peasants".[109] Alexander wrote a letter in 332 BC to Darius III, wherein he argued that he was worthier than Darius "to succeed to the Achaemenid throne".[109] However, Alexander's eventual decision to burn the Achaemenid palace at Persepolis in conjunction with the major rejection and opposition of the "entire Persian people" made it impracticable for him to pose himself as Darius' legitimate successor.[109] Against Bessus (Artaxerxes V) however, Briant adds, Alexander reasserted "his claim to legitimacy as the avenger of Darius III".[109]

A plot against his life was revealed, and one of his officers, Philotas, was executed for failing to alert Alexander. The death of the son necessitated the death of the father, and thus Parmenion, who had been charged with guarding the treasury at Ecbatana, was assassinated at Alexander's command, to prevent attempts at vengeance. Most infamously, Alexander personally killed the man who had saved his life at Granicus, Cleitus the Black, during a violent drunken altercation at Maracanda (modern day Samarkand in Uzbekistan), in which Cleitus accused Alexander of several judgmental mistakes and especially of having forgotten the Macedonian ways in favour of a corrupt oriental lifestyle.[115]

Later, in the Central Asian campaign, a second plot against his life was revealed. This one was instigated by his own royal pages. His official historian, Callisthenes of Olynthus, was implicated in the plot, and in the Anabasis of Alexander, Arrian states that Callisthenes and the pages were then tortured on the rack as punishment, and likely died soon after.[116] It remains unclear if Callisthenes was actually involved in the plot, for prior to his accusation he had fallen out of favour by leading the opposition to the attempt to introduce proskynesis.[117]

Macedon in Alexander's absence

[edit]

When Alexander set out for Asia, he left his general Antipater, an experienced military and political leader, and part of Philip II's "Old Guard", in charge of Macedon.[67] Alexander's sacking of Thebes ensured that Greece remained quiet during his absence.[67] The one exception was a call to arms by Spartan king Agis III in 331 BC, whom Antipater defeated and killed in the battle of Megalopolis.[67] Antipater referred the Spartans' punishment to the League of Corinth, which then deferred to Alexander, who chose to pardon them.[118] There was also considerable friction between Antipater and Olympias, and each complained to Alexander about the other.[119]

In general, Greece enjoyed a period of peace and prosperity during Alexander's campaign in Asia.[120] Alexander sent back vast sums from his conquest, which stimulated the economy and increased trade across his empire.[121] However, Alexander's constant demands for troops and the migration of Macedonians throughout his empire depleted Macedon's strength, greatly weakening it in the years after Alexander, and ultimately led to its subjugation by Rome after the Third Macedonian War (171–168 BC).[20]

Coinage

[edit]
Silver tetradrachm of Alexander the Great struck by Balakros or his successor Menes, both former somatophylakes (bodyguards) of Alexander, when they held the position of satrap of Cilicia in the lifetime of Alexander, c. 333–327 BC. The obverse shows Heracles, ancestor of the Macedonian royal line and the reverse shows a seated Zeus Aëtophoros.[122]

The conquest by Philip II of Pangaeum, and then of the island of Thasos between 356 and 342 BC brought rich gold and silver mines under Macedonian control.[123]

Alexander appears to have introduced a new coinage in Cilicia in Tarsus, after the Battle of Issus in 333 BC, which went on to become the main coinage of the empire.[124] Alexander minted gold staters, silver tetradrachms and drachims, and various fractional bronze coins. The types of these coins remained constant in his empire. The gold series had the head of Athena on the obverse and a winged Nike (Victory) on the reverse.[125] The silver coinage had a beardless head of Heracles wearing a lionskin headdress on the obverse and Zeus aetophoros ('eagle bearer') enthroned with a scepter in his left hand, on the reverse.[126] There are both Greek and non-Greek aspects to this design. Heracles and Zeus were important deities for the Macedonians, with Heracles considered to be the ancestor of the Temenid dynasty and Zeus the patron of the main Macedonian sanctuary, Dium.[124] The lion was also the symbolic animal of the Anatolian god Sandas, worshipped at Tarsus.[124] The reverse design of Alexander's tetradrachms is closely modelled on the depiction of the god Baaltars (Baal of Tarsus), on the silver staters minted at Tarsus by the Persian satrap Mazaeus before Alexander's conquest.[124]

Alexander did not attempt to impose uniform imperial coinage throughout his new conquests. Persian coins continued to circulate in all the satrapies of the empire.[127]

Indian campaign

[edit]

Forays into the Indian subcontinent

[edit]
Alexander's invasion of the Indian subcontinent

After the death of Spitamenes and his marriage to Roxana (Raoxshna in Old Iranian) to cement relations with his new satrapies, Alexander turned to the Indian subcontinent. He invited the chieftains of the former satrapy of Gandhara (a region presently straddling eastern Afghanistan and northern Pakistan), to come to him and submit to his authority. Omphis (Indian name Ambhi), the ruler of Taxila, whose kingdom extended from the Indus to the Hydaspes (Jhelum), complied, but the chieftains of some hill clans, including the Aspasioi and Assakenoi sections of the Kambojas (known in Indian texts also as Ashvayanas and Ashvakayanas), refused to submit.[128] Ambhi hastened to relieve Alexander of his apprehension and met him with valuable presents, placing himself and all his forces at his disposal. Alexander not only returned Ambhi his title and the gifts but he also presented him with a wardrobe of "Persian robes, gold and silver ornaments, 30 horses and 1,000 talents in gold". Alexander was emboldened to divide his forces, and Ambhi assisted Hephaestion and Perdiccas in constructing a bridge over the Indus where it bends at Hund,[129] supplied their troops with provisions, and he received Alexander and his whole army in his capital city of Taxila, with every demonstration of friendship and the most liberal hospitality.

The Phalanx Attacking the Centre in the Battle of the Hydaspes by André Castaigne (1898–1899)

On the subsequent advance of the Macedonian king, Taxiles accompanied him with a force of 5,000 men and took part in the Battle of the Hydaspes. After that victory, he was sent by Alexander in pursuit of Porus, to whom he was charged to offer favourable terms, but narrowly escaped losing his life at the hands of his old enemy. Subsequently, the two rivals were reconciled by the personal mediation of Alexander; Taxiles contributed zealously to the equipment of the fleet on the Hydaspes and was entrusted by Alexander with the government of the whole territory between that river and the Indus. A considerable accession of power was granted him after the death of Philip, son of Machatas, and he was allowed to retain his authority at the death of Alexander himself (323 BC), as well as in the subsequent partition of the provinces at Triparadisus, 321 BC.

In the winter of 327/326 BC, Alexander personally led a campaign against the Aspasioi of the Kunar Valley, the Guraeans of the Guraeus Valley, and the Assakenoi of the Swat and Buner Valleys.[130] A fierce contest ensued with the Aspasioi in which Alexander was wounded in the shoulder by a dart, but eventually the Aspasioi lost. Alexander then faced the Assakenoi who fought against him from the strongholds of Massaga, Ora, and Aornos.[128]

The fort of Massaga was reduced after days of bloody fighting in which Alexander was seriously wounded in the ankle. According to Curtius, "Not only did Alexander slaughter the entire population of Massaga, but also did he reduce its buildings to rubble."[131] A similar slaughter followed at Ora. In the aftermath of Massaga and Ora, numerous Assakenians fled to the fortress of Aornos. Alexander followed close behind and captured the strategic hill-fort after four bloody days.[128]

Porus surrenders to Alexander

After Aornos, Alexander crossed the Indus and won an epic battle against King Porus, who ruled a region lying between the Hydaspes and the Acesines (Chenab), in what is now the Punjab, in the Battle of the Hydaspes in 326 BC.[132] Alexander was impressed by Porus's bravery and made him an ally. He appointed Porus as satrap, and added to Porus's territory land that he did not previously own, towards the south-east, up to the Hyphasis (Beas).[133][134] Choosing a local helped him control these lands that were distant from Greece.[135] Alexander founded two cities on opposite sides of the Hydaspes river, naming one Bucephala, in honour of his horse, who died around this time.[136] The other was Nicaea (Victory), thought to be located at the site of modern-day Mong, Punjab.[137] Philostratus the Elder in the Life of Apollonius of Tyana writes that in the army of Porus, there was an elephant who fought bravely against Alexander's army, and Alexander dedicated it to the Helios (Sun) and named it Ajax because he thought that such a great animal deserved a great name. The elephant had gold rings around its tusks and an inscription was on them written in Greek: "Alexander the son of Zeus dedicates Ajax to the Helios" (ΑΛΕΞΑΝΔΡΟΣ Ο ΔΙΟΣ ΤΟΝ ΑΙΑΝΤΑ ΤΩΙ ΗΛΙΩΙ).[138]

Revolt of the Hellenic army

[edit]
Asia in 323 BC, the Nanda Empire and the Gangaridai of the Indian subcontinent, in relation to Alexander's Empire and neighbours

East of Porus's kingdom, near the Ganges River, was the Nanda Empire of Magadha, and further east, the Gangaridai Empire of Bengal region of the Indian subcontinent. Fearing the prospect of facing other large armies and exhausted by years of campaigning, Alexander's army mutinied at the Hyphasis River (Beas), refusing to march farther east.[139] This river thus marks the easternmost extent of Alexander's conquests.[140]

As for the Macedonians, however, their struggle with Porus blunted their courage and stayed their further advance into India. For having had all they could do to repulse an enemy who mustered only twenty thousand infantry and two thousand horse, they violently opposed Alexander when he insisted on crossing the river Ganges also, the width of which, as they learned, was thirty-two furlongs [6.4 km], its depth one hundred fathoms [180 m], while its banks on the further side were covered with multitudes of men-at-arms and horsemen and elephants. For they were told that the kings of the Ganderites and Praesii were awaiting them with eighty thousand horsemen, two hundred thousand footmen, eight thousand chariots, and six thousand war elephants.[141]

Alexander tried to persuade his soldiers to march farther, but his general Coenus pleaded with him to change his opinion and return; the men, he said, "longed to again see their parents, their wives and children, their homeland". Alexander eventually agreed and turned south, marching along the Indus. Along the way his army conquered the Malhi (in modern-day Multan) and other Indian tribes; while besieging the Mallian citadel, Alexander suffered a near-fatal injury when an arrow penetrated his armor and entered his lung.[142][143]

Alexander sent much of his army to Carmania (modern southern Iran) with general Craterus, and commissioned a fleet to explore the Persian Gulf shore under his admiral Nearchus, while he led the rest back to Persia through the more difficult southern route along the Gedrosian Desert and Makran.[144] Alexander reached Susa in 324 BC, but not before losing many men to the harsh desert.[145]

Last years in Persia

[edit]

Discovering that many of his satraps and military governors had misbehaved in his absence, Alexander executed several of them as examples on his way to Susa.[146][147] As a gesture of thanks, he paid off the debts of his soldiers, and announced that he would send over-aged and disabled veterans back to Macedon, led by Craterus. His troops misunderstood his intention and mutinied at the town of Opis. They refused to be sent away and criticized his adoption of Persian customs and dress and the introduction of Persian officers and soldiers into Macedonian units.[148]

After three days, unable to persuade his men to back down, Alexander gave Persians command posts in the army and conferred Macedonian military titles upon Persian units. The Macedonians quickly begged forgiveness, which Alexander accepted, and held a great banquet with several thousand of his men.[149] In an attempt to craft a lasting harmony between his Macedonian and Persian subjects, Alexander held a mass marriage of his senior officers to Persian and other noblewomen at Susa, but few of those marriages seem to have lasted much beyond a year.[147]

Alexander at the Tomb of Cyrus the Great, by Pierre-Henri de Valenciennes (1796)

Meanwhile, upon his return to Persia, Alexander learned that guards of the tomb of Cyrus the Great in Pasargadae had desecrated it, and swiftly executed them.[150] Alexander admired Cyrus the Great, from an early age reading Xenophon's Cyropaedia, which described Cyrus's heroism in battle and governance as a king and legislator.[151] During his visit to Pasargadae, Alexander ordered his architect Aristobulus to decorate the interior of the sepulchral chamber of Cyrus's tomb.[151]

Afterwards, Alexander travelled to Ecbatana to retrieve the bulk of the Persian treasure. There, his closest friend, Hephaestion, died of illness or poisoning.[152] Hephaestion's death devastated Alexander and he ordered the preparation of an expensive funeral pyre in Babylon along with a decree for public mourning.[152] Back in Babylon, Alexander planned a series of new campaigns, beginning with an invasion of Arabia.[153]

Death and succession

[edit]
A Babylonian astronomical diary (c. 323–322 BC) recording the death of Alexander (British Museum, London)

On either 10 or 11 June 323 BC, Alexander died in the palace of Nebuchadnezzar II, in Babylon, at age 32.[154][155] There are two different versions of Alexander's death, differing slightly in details. Plutarch's account is that roughly 14 days before his death, Alexander entertained admiral Nearchus and spent the night and next day drinking with Medius of Larissa.[156] Alexander developed a fever, which worsened until he was unable to speak. The common soldiers, anxious about his health, were granted the right to file past him as he silently waved at them.[157] In the second account, Diodorus recounts that Alexander was struck with pain after downing a large bowl of unmixed wine in honour of Heracles followed by 11 days of weakness; he did not develop a fever, instead dying after some agony.[158] Arrian also mentioned this as an alternative, but Plutarch specifically denied this claim.[156]

Given the propensity of the Macedonian aristocracy to assassination and Alexander's relatively young age,[159] foul play featured in multiple accounts of his death. Diodorus, Plutarch, Arrian and Justin all mentioned the theory that Alexander was poisoned. Justin stated that Alexander was the victim of a poisoning conspiracy, Plutarch dismissed it as a fabrication,[160] while both Diodorus and Arrian noted that they mentioned it only for the sake of completeness.[158][161] The accounts were nevertheless fairly consistent in designating Antipater, recently removed as Macedonian viceroy, replaced by Craterus, as the head of the alleged plot.[162] Perhaps taking his summons to Babylon as a death sentence[163] and having seen the fate of Parmenion and Philotas,[164] Antipater purportedly arranged for Alexander to be poisoned by his son Iollas, who was Alexander's wine-pourer.[161][164] There was even a suggestion that Aristotle may have participated.[161] The strongest argument against the poison theory is the fact that twelve days passed between the start of his illness and his death; such long-acting poisons were probably not available.[165] However, in a 2003 BBC documentary investigating the death of Alexander, Leo Schep from the New Zealand National Poisons Centre proposed that the plant white hellebore (Veratrum album), which was known in antiquity, may have been used to poison Alexander.[166][167][168] In a 2014 manuscript in the journal Clinical Toxicology, Schep suggested Alexander's wine was spiked with Veratrum album, and that this would produce poisoning symptoms that match the course of events described in the Alexander Romance.[169] Veratrum album poisoning can have a prolonged course and it was suggested that if Alexander was poisoned, Veratrum album offers the most plausible cause.[169][170] Another poisoning explanation put forward in 2010 proposed that the circumstances of his death were compatible with poisoning by water of the river Styx (modern-day Mavroneri in Arcadia, Greece) that contained calicheamicin, a dangerous compound produced by bacteria.[171]

Several natural causes (diseases) have been suggested, including malaria and typhoid fever. A 1998 article in the New England Journal of Medicine attributed his death to typhoid fever complicated by bowel perforation and ascending paralysis.[172] A 2004 analysis suggested pyogenic (infectious) spondylitis or meningitis.[173] Other illnesses fit the symptoms, including acute pancreatitis, West Nile virus,[174][175] and Guillain-Barré syndrome.[176] Natural-cause theories also tend to emphasize that Alexander's health may have been in general decline after years of heavy drinking and severe wounds. The anguish that Alexander felt after Hephaestion's death may also have contributed to his declining health.[172]

Post-death events

[edit]

Alexander's body was laid in a gold anthropoid sarcophagus that was filled with honey, which was in turn placed in a gold casket.[177][178] According to Aelian, a seer called Aristander foretold that the land where Alexander was laid to rest "would be happy and unvanquishable forever".[179] Perhaps more likely, the successors may have seen possession of the body as a symbol of legitimacy, since burying the prior king was a royal prerogative.[180]

19th-century depiction of Alexander's funeral procession, based on the description by Diodorus Siculus

While Alexander's funeral cortege was on its way to Macedon, Ptolemy seized it and took it temporarily to Memphis.[177][179] His successor, Ptolemy II Philadelphus, transferred the sarcophagus to Alexandria, where it remained until at least late antiquity. Ptolemy IX Lathyros, one of Ptolemy's final successors, replaced Alexander's sarcophagus with a glass one so he could convert the original to coinage.[181] The 2014 discovery of an enormous tomb in northern Greece, at Amphipolis, dating from the time of Alexander the Great[182] has given rise to speculation that its original intent was to be the burial place of Alexander. This would fit with the intended destination of Alexander's funeral cortege. However, the memorial was found to be dedicated to the dearest friend of Alexander the Great, Hephaestion.[183][184]

Pompey, Julius Caesar and Augustus all visited the tomb in Alexandria where Augustus, allegedly, accidentally knocked the nose of Alexander's mummified body off. Caligula was said to have taken Alexander's breastplate from the tomb for his own use. Around AD 200, Emperor Septimius Severus closed Alexander's tomb to the public. His son and successor, Caracalla, a great admirer, visited the tomb during his own reign. After this, details on the fate of the tomb are hazy.[181]

Detail of Alexander on the Alexander Sarcophagus

The so-called "Alexander Sarcophagus", discovered near Sidon and now in the Istanbul Archaeology Museum, is so named not because it was thought to have contained Alexander's remains, but because its bas-reliefs depict Alexander and his companions fighting the Persians and hunting. It was originally thought to have been the sarcophagus of Abdalonymus (died 311 BC), the king of Sidon appointed by Alexander immediately following the Battle of Issus in 332.[185][186] However, in 1969, it was suggested by Karl Schefold that it may date from earlier than Abdalonymus's death.[187]

Demades likened the Macedonian army, after the death of Alexander, to the blinded Cyclops due to the many random and disorderly movements that it made.[188][189][190] In addition, Leosthenes also likened the anarchy between the generals, after Alexander's death, to the blinded Cyclops "who after he had lost his eye went feeling and groping about with his hands before him, not knowing where to lay them".[191]

Division of the Macedonian Empire

[edit]
Kingdoms of the Diadochi in 301 BC: the Ptolemaic Kingdom (dark blue), the Seleucid Empire (yellow), Kingdom of Lysimachus (orange), and Kingdom of Macedon (green). Also shown are the Roman Republic (light blue), the Carthaginian Republic (purple), and the Kingdom of Epirus (red).

Alexander's death was so sudden that when reports of his death reached Greece, they were not immediately believed.[67] Alexander had no obvious or legitimate heir, his son Alexander IV by Roxane being born after Alexander's death.[192] According to Diodorus, Alexander's companions asked him on his deathbed to whom he bequeathed his kingdom; his laconic reply was "tôi kratistôi"—"to the strongest".[158] Another theory is that his successors wilfully or erroneously misheard "tôi Kraterôi"—"to Craterus", the general leading his Macedonian troops home and newly entrusted with the regency of Macedonia.[193] Arrian and Plutarch claimed that Alexander was speechless by this time, implying that this was an apocryphal story.[194] Diodorus, Curtius and Justin offered the more plausible story that Alexander passed his signet ring to Perdiccas, a bodyguard and leader of the companion cavalry, in front of witnesses, thereby nominating him.[158][192]

Perdiccas initially did not claim power, instead suggesting that Roxane's baby would be king, if male, with himself, Craterus, Leonnatus, and Antipater as guardians. However, the infantry, under the command of Meleager, rejected this arrangement since they had been excluded from the discussion. Instead, they supported Alexander's half-brother Philip Arrhidaeus. Eventually, the two sides reconciled, and after the birth of Alexander IV, he and Philip III were appointed joint kings, albeit in name only.[195] Dissension and rivalry soon affected the Macedonians. The satrapies handed out by Perdiccas at the Partition of Babylon became power bases each general used to bid for power. After the assassination of Perdiccas in 321 BC, Macedonian unity collapsed, and 40 years of war between "The Successors" (Diadochi) ensued before the Hellenistic world settled into three stable power blocs: Ptolemaic Egypt, Seleucid Syria and East, and Antigonid Macedonia. In the process, both Alexander IV and Philip III were murdered.[196]

Last plans

[edit]
Alexander (left), wearing a kausia and fighting an Asiatic lion with his friend Craterus (detail); late 4th century BC mosaic,[197] Pella Museum

Diodorus stated that Alexander had given detailed written instructions to Craterus some time before his death, which are known as Alexander's "last plans".[198] Craterus started to carry out Alexander's commands, but the successors chose not to further implement them, on the grounds they were impractical and extravagant.[198] Furthermore, Perdiccas had read the notebooks containing Alexander's last plans to the Macedonian troops in Babylon, who voted not to carry them out.[67]

According to Diodorus, Alexander's last plans called for military expansion into the southern and western Mediterranean, monumental constructions, and the intermixing of Eastern and Western populations. It included:

  • Construction of 1,000 ships larger than triremes, along with harbours and a road running along the African coast all the way to the Pillars of Hercules, to be used for an invasion of Carthage and the western Mediterranean;[199]
  • Erection of great temples in Delos, Delphi, Dodona, Dium, Amphipolis, all costing 1,500 talents, and a monumental temple to Athena at Troy[67][199]
  • Amalgamation of small settlements into larger cities ("synoecisms") and the "transplant of populations from Asia to Europe and in the opposite direction from Europe to Asia, in order to bring the largest continent to common unity and to friendship by means of intermarriage and family ties"[200][199]
  • Construction of a monumental tomb for his father Philip, "to match the greatest of the pyramids of Egypt"[67][199]
  • Conquest of Arabia[67]
  • Circumnavigation of Africa[67]

The enormous scale of these plans has led many scholars to doubt their historicity. Ernst Badian argued that they were exaggerated by Perdiccas in order to ensure that the Macedonian troops voted not to carry them out.[199] Other scholars have proposed that they were invented by later authors within the tradition of the Alexander Romance.[201]

Character

[edit]

Generalship

[edit]

Alexander perhaps earned the epithet "the Great" due to his unparalleled success as a military commander; he never lost a battle, despite typically being outnumbered.[202] This was due to use of terrain, phalanx and cavalry tactics, bold strategy, and the fierce loyalty of his troops.[203] The Macedonian phalanx, armed with the sarissa, a spear 6 metres (20 ft) long, had been developed and perfected by Philip II through rigorous training, and Alexander used its speed and manoeuvrability to great effect against larger but more disparate Persian forces.[204] Alexander also recognized the potential for disunity among his diverse army, which employed various languages and weapons. He overcame this by being personally involved in battle,[96] in the manner of a Macedonian king.[203]

The Battle of the Granicus, 334 BC

In his first battle in Asia, at Granicus, Alexander used only a small part of his forces, perhaps 13,000 infantry with 5,000 cavalry, against a much larger Persian force of 40,000.[205] Alexander placed the phalanx at the center and cavalry and archers on the wings, so that his line matched the length of the Persian cavalry line, about 3 km (1.86 mi). By contrast, the Persian infantry was stationed behind its cavalry. This ensured that Alexander would not be outflanked, while his phalanx, armed with long pikes, had a considerable advantage over the Persians' scimitars and javelins. Macedonian losses were negligible compared to those of the Persians.[206]

The Battle of Issus, 333 BC

At Issus in 333 BC, his first confrontation with Darius, he used the same deployment, and again the central phalanx pushed through.[206] Alexander personally led the charge in the center, routing the opposing army.[207] At the decisive encounter with Darius at Gaugamela, Darius equipped his chariots with scythes on the wheels to break up the phalanx and equipped his cavalry with pikes. Alexander arranged a double phalanx, with the center advancing at an angle, parting when the chariots bore down and then reforming. The advance was successful and broke Darius's center, causing the latter to flee once again.[206]

When faced with opponents who used unfamiliar fighting techniques, such as in Central Asia and India, Alexander adapted his forces to his opponents' style. Thus, in Bactria and Sogdiana, Alexander successfully used his javelin throwers and archers to prevent outflanking movements, while massing his cavalry at the center.[207] In India, confronted by Porus's elephant corps, the Macedonians opened their ranks to envelop the elephants and used their sarissas to strike upwards and dislodge the elephants' handlers.[149]

Physical appearance

[edit]
Roman copy of the Alexander portrait by Lysippos

Historical sources frequently give conflicting accounts of Alexander's appearance, and the earliest sources are the most scant in their detail;[208] for example, Arrian describes him simply as "very handsome".[209] During his lifetime, Alexander carefully curated his image by commissioning works from famous and great artists of the time. This included commissioning sculptures by Lysippos, paintings by Apelles and gem engravings by Pyrgoteles.[210] Ancient authors recorded that Alexander was so pleased with portraits of himself created by Lysippos that he forbade other sculptors from crafting his image; scholars today, however, find the claim dubious.[211][210] Andrew Stewart highlights the fact that artistic portraits, not least because of who they are commissioned by, are always partisan, and that artistic portrayals of Alexander "seek to legitimize him (or, by extension, his Successors), to interpret him to their audiences, to answer their critiques, and to persuade them of his greatness", and thus should be considered within a framework of "praise and blame", in the same way sources such as praise poetry are.[212] Nevertheless, though idealised, Lysippos's sculpture was thought to be the most faithful plastic representation.[213]

Head of Alexander the Great by Leochares, c. 330 BC
3rd century BC bust of Alexander from Alexandria, Egypt.[214]

Curtius Rufus, a Roman historian from the first century AD, who wrote the Histories of Alexander the Great, gives this account of Alexander sitting on the throne of Darius III:

Then Alexander seating himself on the royal throne, which was far too high for his bodily stature. Therefore, since his feet did not reach its lowest step, one of the royal pages placed a table under his feet.[215]

Both Curtius and Diodorus report a story that when Darius III's mother, Sisygambis, first met Alexander and Hephaestion, she assumed that the latter was Alexander because he was the taller and more physically impressive of the two.[216][217]

The Greek biographer Plutarch (c. 45 – c. 120 AD) discusses the accuracy of his depictions:

The outward appearance of Alexander is best represented by the statues of him which Lysippus made, and it was by this artist alone that Alexander himself thought it fit that he should be modelled. For those peculiarities which many of his successors and friends afterwards tried to imitate, namely, the poise of the neck, which was bent slightly to the left, and the melting glance of his eyes, this artist has accurately observed. Apelles, however, in painting him as wielder of the thunder-bolt, did not reproduce his complexion, but made it too dark and swarthy. Whereas he was of a fair colour, as they say, and his fairness passed into ruddiness on his breast particularly, and in his face. Moreover, that a very pleasant odour exhaled from his skin and that there was a fragrance about his mouth and all his flesh, so that his garments were filled with it, this we have read in the Memoirs of Aristoxenus.[218]

Alexander cameo by Pyrgoteles

Historians have understood the detail of the pleasant fragrance attributed to Alexander as stemming from a belief in ancient Greece that pleasant scents are characteristic of gods and heroes.[210]

The Alexander Mosaic and contemporary coins portray Alexander with "a straight nose, a slightly protruding jaw, full lips and eyes deep set beneath a strongly pronounced forehead".[210] He is also described as having a slight upward tilt of his head to the left.[219]

The ancient historian Aelian (c. 175c. 235 AD), in his Varia Historia (12.14), describes Alexander's hair color as "ξανθὴν" (xanthen), which at the time, could mean blond, brown, tawny (light brown) or auburn.[220][221][222] It is sometimes claimed that Alexander had one blue and one brown eye,[223] referring to the Alexander Romance, which is however a fictional account that also claims Alexander "had sharp teeth like fangs" and "did not look like Philip or Olympias". Reconstruction, based on remaining traces of paint of the original polychromy on the Alexander Sarcophagus from Sidon, indicates that he was depicted with brown eyes and chestnut brown hair.[224][225] The Acropolis Museum suggests that trace amounts of red paint on a head statue of Alexander found in 1886 were most likely a base coat for golden hues to be painted over for his hair.[226] The Pella mosaic of a lion hunt (late 4th century BC) depicts him as having blond hair, with empty spots where their eye stones (which would've been used with semi-precious gems) having been plucked out.[227][228][229]

Personality

[edit]
A fresco depicting a hunt scene at the tomb of Philip II at Aigai, the only known artistic depiction of Alexander that was securely made during his lifetime, 330s BC

Both of Alexander's parents encouraged his ambitions. His father Philip was probably Alexander's most immediate and influential role model, as the young Alexander watched him campaign practically every year, winning victory after victory while ignoring severe wounds.[55] Alexander's relationship with his father "forged" the competitive side of his personality; he had a need to outdo his father, illustrated by his reckless behavior in battle.[230] While Alexander worried that his father would leave him "no great or brilliant achievement to be displayed to the world",[231] he also downplayed his father's achievements to his companions.[230] Alexander's mother Olympias similarly had huge ambitions, and encouraged her son to believe it was his destiny to conquer the Persian Empire.[230] She instilled a sense of destiny in him,[232] and Plutarch tells how his ambition "kept his spirit serious and lofty in advance of his years".[233]

According to Plutarch, Alexander also had a violent temper and rash, impulsive nature,[234] which could influence his decision making.[230] Although Alexander was stubborn and did not respond well to orders from his father, he was open to reasoned debate.[235] He had a calmer side—perceptive, logical, and calculating. He had a great desire for knowledge, a love for philosophy, and was an avid reader.[236] This was no doubt in part due to Aristotle's tutelage; Alexander was intelligent and quick to learn.[230] His intelligent and rational side was amply demonstrated by his ability and success as a general.[234] He had great self-restraint in "pleasures of the body", in contrast with his lack of self-control with alcohol.[237]

Alexander was erudite and patronized both arts and sciences.[233][236] However, he had little interest in sports or the Olympic Games (unlike his father), seeking only the Homeric ideals of honour (timê) and glory (kudos).[238] He had great charisma and force of personality, characteristics which made him a great leader.[192][234] His unique abilities were further demonstrated by the inability of any of his generals to unite Macedonia and retain the Empire after his death—only Alexander had the ability to do so.[192]

Stag Hunt Mosaic, the figure on the right possibly being Alexander, and the figure to the left wields a double-headed axe, likely alluding to Hephaistos; possibly meaning his general Hephaestion

During his final years, and especially after the death of Hephaestion, Alexander began to exhibit signs of megalomania and paranoia.[163] His extraordinary achievements, coupled with his own ineffable sense of destiny and the flattery of his companions, may have combined to produce this effect.[239] His delusions of grandeur are readily visible in his will and in his desire to conquer the world,[163] in as much as he is by various sources described as having boundless ambition,[240][241] an epithet, the meaning of which has descended into a historical cliché.[242][243]

He appears to have believed himself a deity, or at least sought to deify himself.[163] Olympias always insisted to him that he was the son of Zeus,[244] an idea apparently confirmed to him by the oracle of Amun at Siwa.[245] He began to identify himself as the son of Zeus-Ammon.[245] Alexander adopted elements of Persian dress and customs at court, notably proskynesis, which was one aspect of Alexander's broad strategy aimed at securing the aid and support of the Iranian upper classes;[109] however the practise of proskynesis was disapproved by the Macedonians, and they were unwilling to perform it.[113] This behaviour cost him the sympathies of many of his countrymen.[246] Alexander also was a pragmatic ruler who understood the difficulties of ruling culturally disparate peoples, many of whom lived in societies where the king was treated as divine.[247] Thus, rather than megalomania, his behaviour may have been a practical attempt at strengthening his rule and keeping his empire together.[248]

Personal relationships

[edit]
A mural in Pompeii, depicting the marriage of Alexander to Stateira in 324 BC; the couple is apparently dressed as Ares and Aphrodite.

Alexander married three times: Roxana, daughter of the Sogdian nobleman Oxyartes of Bactria,[249][250][251] out of love;[252] the Persian princesses Stateira and Parysatis, the former a daughter of Darius III and the latter a daughter of Artaxerxes III, for political reasons.[253][254] Alexander apparently had two children by Roxana: a son, who was born in India and died in infancy in November 326 BC,[255] and Alexander IV of Macedon, born after his father's death. Additionally Heracles of Macedon was claimed to be his illegitimate son born of mistress, Barsine.

Alexander also had a close relationship with his friend, general, and bodyguard Hephaestion, the son of a Macedonian noble.[152][230][256] Hephaestion's death devastated Alexander.[152][257] This event may have contributed to Alexander's failing health and detached mental state during his final months.[163][172]

Sexuality

[edit]

Alexander's sexuality has been the subject of speculation and controversy in modern times.[258] The Roman era writer Athenaeus says, based on the scholar Dicaearchus, who was Alexander's contemporary, that the king "was quite excessively keen on boys", and that Alexander kissed the eunuch Bagoas in public.[259] This episode is also told by Plutarch, probably based on the same source. Historian William Woodthorpe Tarn rejected the stories of Bagoas as fabricated in ancient times to defame Alexander, mainly referring to the Rufus's fairly fictionalized biography of Alexander that criticized the Macedonian's "degeneration" in embracing foreign Persian customs.[260] However, in 1958 Badian countered Tarn's arguments, though his concern was the issue of the reliability of sources for Alexander rather than the figure of the eunuch himself.[261] None of Alexander's contemporaries, however, are known to have explicitly described Alexander's relationship with Hephaestion as sexual, though the pair was often compared to Achilles and Patroclus, who are often interpreted as a couple. Aelian writes of Alexander's visit to Troy where "Alexander garlanded the tomb of Achilles, and Hephaestion that of Patroclus, the latter hinting that he was a beloved of Alexander, in just the same way as Patroclus was of Achilles."[262] At the same time, ancient writers did not conclusively identify them as lovers.[263] Some modern historians (e.g., Robin Lane Fox) believe not only that Alexander's youthful relationship with Hephaestion was sexual, but also that their sexual contacts may have continued into adulthood, which went against the social norms of at least some Greek cities, such as Athens,[264][265] though some modern researchers have tentatively proposed that Macedonia (or at least the Macedonian court) may have been more tolerant of homosexuality between adults.[266]

Alexander and his general Hephaestion, at the Getty Villa

Peter Green argues that there is little evidence in ancient sources that Alexander had much sexual interest in women; he did not produce an heir until the very end of his life.[230] However, Ogden calculates that Alexander, who impregnated his partners three times in eight years, had fathered more children than his father at the same age.[267] Two of these pregnancies—Stateira's and Barsine's—are of dubious legitimacy.[268]

According to Diodorus Siculus, Alexander accumulated a harem in the style of Persian kings, but he used it rather sparingly, "not wishing to offend the Macedonians",[269] showing great self-control in "pleasures of the body".[237] Nevertheless, Plutarch described how Alexander was infatuated by Roxana while complimenting him on not forcing himself on her.[270] Green suggested that, in the context of the period, Alexander formed quite strong friendships with women, including Ada of Caria, who adopted him, and even Darius's mother Sisygambis, who supposedly died from grief upon hearing of Alexander's death.[230]

Battle record

[edit]
Outcome Date War Action Opponent/s Type Country
(present day)
Rank
Victory 338-08-02 2 August 338 BC Philip II's submission of Greece Chaeronea Battle of Chaeronea .Thebans, Athenians and other Greek cities Battle Greece Prince

Victory 335 335 BC Balkan Campaign Mount Haemus Battle of Mount Haemus .Getae, Thracians Battle Bulgaria King

Victory 335-12 December 335 BC Balkan Campaign Pelium Siege of Pelium .Illyrians Siege Albania King

Victory 335-12 December 335 BC Balkan Campaign Pelium Battle of Thebes .Thebans Battle Greece King

Victory 334-05 May 334 BC Persian Campaign Granicus Battle of the Granicus .Achaemenid Empire Battle Turkey King

Victory 334 334 BC Persian Campaign Miletus Siege of Miletus .Achaemenid Empire, Milesians Siege Turkey King

Victory 334 334 BC Persian Campaign Halicarnassus Siege of Halicarnassus .Achaemenid Empire Siege Turkey King

Victory 333-11-05 5 November 333 BC Persian Campaign Issus Battle of Issus .Achaemenid Empire Battle Turkey King

Victory 332 January–July 332 BC Persian Campaign Tyre Siege of Tyre .Achaemenid Empire, Tyrians Siege Lebanon King

Victory 332-10 October 332 BC Persian Campaign Tyre Siege of Gaza .Achaemenid Empire Siege Palestine King

Victory 331-10-01 1 October 331 BC Persian Campaign Gaugamela Battle of Gaugamela .Achaemenid Empire Battle Iraq King

Victory 331-12 December 331 BC Persian Campaign Uxian Defile Battle of the Uxian Defile .Uxians Battle Iran King

Victory 330-01-20 20 January 330 BC Persian Campaign Persian Gate Battle of the Persian Gate .Achaemenid Empire Battle Iran King

Victory 329 329 BC Persian Campaign Cyropolis Siege of Cyropolis .Sogdians Siege Turkmenistan King

Victory 329-10 October 329 BC Persian Campaign Jaxartes Battle of Jaxartes .Scythians Battle Uzbekistan King

Victory 327 327 BC Persian Campaign Sogdian Rock Siege of the Sogdian Rock .Sogdians Siege Uzbekistan King

Victory 327 May 327 – March 326 BC Indian Campaign Cophen Cophen campaign .Aspasians Expedition Afghanistan and Pakistan King

Victory 326-04 April 326 BC Indian Campaign Aornos Siege of Aornos .Aśvaka Siege Pakistan King

Victory 326-05 May 326 BC Indian Campaign Hydaspes Battle of the Hydaspes .Porus Battle Pakistan King

Victory 325 November 326 – February 325 BC Indian Campaign Aornos Siege of Multan .Malli Siege Pakistan King

Legacy

[edit]

Alexander's legacy extended beyond his military conquests, and his reign marked a turning point in European and Asian history.[271] His campaigns greatly increased contacts and trade between East and West, and vast areas to the east were significantly exposed to Greek civilization and influence.[20] Some of the cities he founded became major cultural centers, many surviving into the 21st century. His chroniclers recorded valuable information about the areas through which he marched, while the Greeks themselves got a sense of belonging to a world beyond the Mediterranean.[20]

Hellenistic kingdoms

[edit]
The Hellenistic world view: world map by Eratosthenes (276–194 BC), using information from the campaigns of Alexander and his successors[272]

Alexander's most immediate legacy was the introduction of Macedonian rule to huge new swathes of Asia. At the time of his death, Alexander's empire covered some 5,200,000 km2 (2,000,000 sq mi),[273] and was the largest state of its time. Many of these areas remained in Macedonian hands or under Greek influence for the next 200–300 years. The successor states that emerged were, at least initially, dominant forces, and these 300 years are often referred to as the Hellenistic period.[274]

The eastern borders of Alexander's empire began to collapse even during his lifetime.[192] However, the power vacuum he left in the northwest of the Indian subcontinent directly gave rise to one of the most powerful Indian dynasties in history, the Maurya Empire. Taking advantage of this power vacuum, Chandragupta Maurya (referred to in Greek sources as "Sandrokottos"), of relatively humble origin, took control of the Punjab, and with that power base proceeded to conquer the Nanda Empire.[275]

Founding of cities

[edit]
Plan of Alexandria c. 30 BC

Over the course of his conquests, Alexander founded many cities that bore his name, most of them east of the Tigris.[114][276] The first, and greatest, was Alexandria in Egypt, which would become one of the leading Mediterranean cities.[114] The cities' locations reflected trade routes as well as defensive positions. At first, the cities must have been inhospitable, little more than defensive garrisons.[114] Following Alexander's death, many Greeks who had settled there tried to return to Greece.[114][276] However, a century or so after Alexander's death, many of the Alexandrias were thriving, with elaborate public buildings and substantial populations that included both Greek and local peoples.[114]

Funding of temples

[edit]
Dedication of Alexander the Great to Athena Polias at Priene, now housed in the British Museum[277]

In 334 BC, Alexander the Great donated funds for the completion of the new temple of Athena Polias in Priene, in modern-day western Turkey.[278] An inscription from the temple, now housed in the British Museum, declares: "King Alexander dedicated [this temple] to Athena Polias."[277] This inscription is one of the few independent archaeological discoveries confirming an episode from Alexander's life.[277] The temple was designed by Pytheos, one of the architects of the Mausoleum at Halicarnassus.[277][278][279]

Libanius wrote that Alexander founded the temple of Zeus Bottiaios (Ancient Greek: Βοττιαίου Δῖός), in the place where later the city of Antioch was built.[280][281]

Suda wrote that Alexander built a big temple to Sarapis.[282]

In 2023, British Museum experts have suggested the possibility that a Greek temple at Girsu in Iraq, was founded by Alexander. According to the researchers, recent discoveries suggest that "this site honours Zeus and two divine sons. The sons are Heracles and Alexander."[283]

Hellenization

[edit]
Alexander's empire was the largest state of its time, covering approximately 5.2 million square km.

Hellenization was coined by the German historian Johann Gustav Droysen to denote the spread of Greek language, culture, and population into the former Persian empire after Alexander's conquest.[274] This process can be seen in such great Hellenistic cities as Alexandria, Antioch[284] and Seleucia (south of modern Baghdad).[285] Alexander sought to insert Greek elements into Persian culture and to hybridize Greek and Persian culture, homogenizing the populations of Asia and Europe. Although his successors explicitly rejected such policies, Hellenization occurred throughout the region, accompanied by a distinct and opposite 'Orientalization' of the successor states.[286]

The core of the Hellenistic culture promulgated by the conquests was essentially Athenian.[287] The close association of men from across Greece in Alexander's army directly led to the emergence of the largely Attic-based "koine", or "common" Greek dialect.[288] Koine spread throughout the Hellenistic world, becoming the lingua franca of Hellenistic lands, and eventually the ancestor of modern Greek.[288] Furthermore, town planning, education, local government, and art current in the Hellenistic period were all based on Classical Greek ideals, evolving into distinct new forms commonly grouped as Hellenistic. Also, the New Testament was written in the Koine Greek language.[284] Aspects of Hellenistic culture were still evident in the traditions of the Byzantine Empire in the mid-15th century.[289]

Hellenization in South and Central Asia

[edit]
The Buddha, in Greco-Buddhist style, 1st to 2nd century AD, Gandhara, northern Pakistan. Tokyo National Museum.

Some of the most pronounced effects of Hellenization can be seen in Afghanistan and India, in the region of the relatively late-rising Greco-Bactrian Kingdom (250–125 BC) (in modern Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Tajikistan) and the Indo-Greek Kingdom (180 BC – 10 AD) in modern Afghanistan and India.[290] On the Silk Road trade routes, Hellenistic culture hybridized with Iranian and Buddhist cultures. The cosmopolitan art and mythology of Gandhara (a region spanning the upper confluence of the Indus, Swat and Kabul rivers in modern Pakistan) of the ~3rd century BC to the ~5th century AD are most evident of the direct contact between Hellenistic civilization and South Asia, as are the Edicts of Ashoka, which directly mention the Greeks within Ashoka's dominion as converting to Buddhism and the reception of Buddhist emissaries by Ashoka's contemporaries in the Hellenistic world.[291] The resulting syncretism known as Greco-Buddhism influenced the development of Buddhism[292] and created a culture of Greco-Buddhist art. These Greco-Buddhist kingdoms sent some of the first Buddhist missionaries to China, Sri Lanka and Hellenistic Asia and Europe (Greco-Buddhist monasticism).

Some of the first and most influential figurative portrayals of The Buddha appeared at this time, perhaps modelled on Greek statues of Apollo in the Greco-Buddhist style.[293] Several Buddhist traditions may have been influenced by the ancient Greek religion: the concept of Boddhisatvas is reminiscent of Greek divine heroes,[294] and some Mahayana ceremonial practices (burning incense, gifts of flowers, and food placed on altars) are similar to those practised by the ancient Greeks; however, similar practices were also observed amongst the native Indic culture. One Greek king, Menander I, probably became Buddhist, and was immortalized in Buddhist literature as 'Milinda'.[293] The process of Hellenization also spurred trade between the east and west.[295] For example, Greek astronomical instruments dating to the 3rd century BC were found in the Greco-Bactrian city of Ai Khanoum in modern-day Afghanistan,[296] while the Greek concept of a spherical Earth surrounded by the spheres of planets eventually supplanted the long-standing Indian cosmological belief of a disc consisting of four continents grouped around a central mountain (Mount Meru) like the petals of a flower.[295][297][298] The Yavanajataka (lit.'Greek astronomical treatise') and Paulisa Siddhanta texts depict the influence of Greek astronomical ideas on Indian astronomy.

Following the conquests of Alexander the Great in the east, Hellenistic influence on Indian art was far-reaching. In architecture, a few examples of the Ionic order can be found as far as Pakistan with the Jandial temple near Taxila. Several examples of capitals displaying Ionic influences can be seen as far as Patna, especially with the Pataliputra capital, dated to the 3rd century BC.[299] The Corinthian order is also heavily represented in the art of Gandhara, especially through Indo-Corinthian capitals.

Influence on Rome

[edit]
This medallion was produced in Imperial Rome, demonstrating the influence of Alexander's memory. Walters Art Museum, Baltimore.

Alexander and his exploits were admired by many Romans, especially generals, who wanted to associate themselves with his achievements.[300] Polybius began his Histories by reminding Romans of Alexander's achievements, and thereafter Roman leaders saw him as a role model. Pompey the Great adopted the epithet "Magnus" and even Alexander's anastole-type haircut, and searched the conquered lands of the east for Alexander's 260-year-old cloak, which he then wore as a sign of greatness.[300] Julius Caesar dedicated a Lysippean equestrian bronze statue, but replaced Alexander's head with his own, while Octavian visited Alexander's tomb in Alexandria and temporarily changed his seal from a sphinx to Alexander's profile.[300] The emperor Trajan also admired Alexander, as did Nero and Caracalla.[300] The Macriani, a Roman family that in the person of Macrinus briefly ascended to the imperial throne, kept images of Alexander on their persons, either on jewellery or embroidered into their clothes.[301]

On the other hand, some Roman writers, particularly Republican figures, used Alexander as a cautionary tale of how autocratic tendencies can be kept in check by the values of the Roman Republic.[302] Alexander was used by these writers as an example of ruler values such as amicitia (friendship) and clementia (clemency), but also iracundia (anger) and cupiditas gloriae (over-desire for glory).[302]

Emperor Julian in his satire called "The Caesars", describes a contest between the previous Roman emperors, with Alexander the Great called in as an extra contestant, in the presence of the assembled gods.[303]

The Itinerarium Alexandri is a 4th-century Latin description of Alexander the Great's campaigns.

Julius Caesar went to serve his quaestorship in Hispania after his wife's funeral, in the spring or early summer of 69 BC. While there, he encountered a statue of Alexander the Great, and realised with dissatisfaction that he was now at an age when Alexander had the world at his feet, while he had achieved comparatively little.[304][305]

Pompey posed as the "new Alexander" since he was his boyhood hero.[306]

After Caracalla concluded his campaign against the Alamanni, it became evident that he was inordinately preoccupied with Alexander the Great.[307][308] He began openly mimicking Alexander in his personal style. In planning his invasion of the Parthian Empire, Caracalla decided to arrange 16,000 of his men in Macedonian-style phalanxes, despite the Roman army having made the phalanx an obsolete tactical formation.[307][308][309] The historian Christopher Matthew mentions that the term Phalangarii has two possible meanings, both with military connotations. The first refers merely to the Roman battle line and does not specifically mean that the men were armed with pikes, and the second bears similarity to the 'Marian Mules' of the late Roman Republic who carried their equipment suspended from a long pole, which were in use until at least the 2nd century AD.[309] As a consequence, the Phalangarii of Legio II Parthica may not have been pikemen, but rather standard battle line troops or possibly Triarii.[309]

Caracalla's mania for Alexander went so far that Caracalla visited Alexandria while preparing for his Persian invasion and persecuted philosophers of the Aristotelian school based on a legend that Aristotle had poisoned Alexander. This was a sign of Caracalla's increasingly erratic behaviour. But this mania for Alexander, strange as it was, was overshadowed by subsequent events in Alexandria.[308]

In AD 39, Caligula performed a spectacular stunt by ordering a temporary floating bridge to be built using ships as pontoons, stretching for over two miles from the resort of Baiae to the neighbouring port of Puteoli.[310][311] It was said that the bridge was to rival the Persian king Xerxes' pontoon bridge crossing of the Hellespont.[311] Caligula, who could not swim,[312] then proceeded to ride his favourite horse Incitatus across, wearing the breastplate of Alexander the Great.[311] This act was in defiance of a prediction by Tiberius's soothsayer Thrasyllus of Mendes that Caligula had "no more chance of becoming emperor than of riding a horse across the Bay of Baiae".[311]

The diffusion of Greek culture and language cemented by Alexander's conquests in West Asia and North Africa served as a "precondition" for the later Roman expansion into these territories and entire basis for the Byzantine Empire, according to Errington.[313]

Letters

[edit]

Alexander wrote and received numerous letters, but no originals survive. A few official letters addressed to the Greek cities survive in copies inscribed in stone and the content of others is sometimes reported in historical sources. These only occasionally quote the letters and it is an open question how reliable such quotations are. Several fictitious letters, some perhaps based on actual letters, made their way into the Romance tradition.[314]

In legend

[edit]
Alexander in a 14th-century Armenian manuscript

Many of the legends about Alexander derive from his own lifetime, probably encouraged by Alexander himself.[315] His court historian Callisthenes portrayed the sea in Cilicia as drawing back from him in proskynesis. Writing shortly after Alexander's death, Onesicritus invented a tryst between Alexander and Thalestris, queen of the mythical Amazons. He reportedly read this passage to his patron King Lysimachus, who had been one of Alexander's generals and who quipped, "I wonder where I was at the time."[316]

In the first centuries after Alexander's death, probably in Alexandria, a quantity of the legendary material coalesced into a text known as the Alexander Romance, later falsely ascribed to Callisthenes and therefore known as Pseudo-Callisthenes. This text underwent over one hundred recensions, translations, and derivations throughout the Islamic and European worlds in premodern times,[317] containing many dubious stories,[315] and was translated into twenty-five languages,[318] for example Middle Persian, Syriac and Arabic.[319][9]

In ancient and modern culture

[edit]
Alexander in a 14th-century Byzantine manuscript

Alexander the Great's accomplishments and legacy have been depicted in many cultures. Alexander has featured in both high and popular culture, beginning from his own era to the present day. The Alexander Romance, in particular, has had a significant impact on portrayals of Alexander in later cultures, from Persian to medieval European, to modern Greek.[318]

Alexander features prominently in modern Greek folklore, more than any other ancient figure.[320] The colloquial form of his name in modern Greek ("O Megalexandros") is a household name, and he is the only ancient hero to appear in the Karagiozis shadow play.[320] One well-known fable among Greek seamen involves a solitary mermaid who would grasp a ship's prow during a storm and ask the captain, "Is King Alexander alive?" The answer should be "He is alive and well and rules the world!" causing the mermaid to vanish and the sea to calm. Any other answer would cause the mermaid to turn into a raging Gorgon who would drag the ship to the bottom of the sea, all hands aboard.[320]

Folio from the Shahnameh showing Alexander praying at the Kaaba, mid-16th century

In pre-Islamic Middle Persian (Zoroastrian) literature, Alexander is referred to by the epithet gujastak, meaning "accursed", and is accused of destroying temples and burning the sacred texts of Zoroastrianism.[321] In Islamic Persia, under the influence of the Alexander Romance (in Persian: اسکندرنامه Iskandarnameh), a more positive portrayal of Alexander emerges.[322] Firdausi's Shahnameh ("The Book of Kings") includes Alexander in a line of legitimate Persian shahs, a mythical figure who explored the far reaches of the world in search of the Fountain of Youth.[323] In the Shahnameh, Alexander's first journey is to Mecca to pray at the Kaaba.[324] Alexander was depicted as performing a Hajj (pilgrimage to Mecca) many times in subsequent Islamic art and literature.[325] Later Persian writers associate him with philosophy, portraying him at a symposium with figures such as Socrates, Plato and Aristotle, in search of immortality.[322]

Detail of a 16th-century Islamic painting depicting Alexander being lowered in a glass submersible

The figure of Dhu al-Qarnayn (Arabic: ذو القرنين; lit.'The Two-Horned One') is believed by the majority of modern researchers of the Qur'an as well as Islamic commentators to be a reference to Alexander.[326] The figure is also believed by scholars to be based on later legends of Alexander.[322] In this tradition, he was a heroic figure who built a wall to defend against the nations of Gog and Magog.[327] He also travelled the known world in search of the Water of Life and Immortality, eventually becoming a prophet.[327]

The Syriac version of the Alexander Romance portrays him as an ideal Christian world conqueror who prayed to "the one true God".[322] In Egypt, Alexander was portrayed as the son of Nectanebo II, the last pharaoh before the Persian conquest.[327] His defeat of Darius was depicted as Egypt's salvation, "proving" Egypt was still ruled by an Egyptian.[322]

According to Josephus, Alexander was shown the Book of Daniel when he entered Jerusalem, which described a mighty Greek king who would conquer the Persian Empire. This is cited as a reason for sparing Jerusalem.[328]

Alexander conquering the air. Jean Wauquelin, Les faits et conquêtes d'Alexandre le Grand, 1448–1449

In Hindi and Urdu, the name "Sikandar", derived from the Persian name for Alexander, denotes a rising young talent, and the Delhi Sultanate ruler Alauddin Khalji stylized himself as "Sikandar-i-Sani" (the Second Alexander the Great).[329] In medieval India, Turkic and Afghan sovereigns from the Iranian-cultured region of Central Asia brought positive cultural connotations of Alexander to the Indian subcontinent, resulting in the efflorescence of Sikandernameh (Alexander Romances) written by Indo-Persian poets such as Amir Khusrau and the prominence of Alexander the Great as a popular subject in Mughal-era Persian miniatures.[330] In medieval Europe, Alexander the Great was revered as a member of the Nine Worthies; a group of heroes whose lives were believed to encapsulate all the ideal qualities of chivalry.[331] During the first Italian campaign of the French Revolutionary Wars, in a question from Bourrienne, asking whether he gave his preference to Alexander or Caesar, Napoleon said that he places Alexander The Great in the first rank, the main reason being his campaign on Asia.[332]

Historiography

[edit]

Apart from a few inscriptions and fragments, texts written by people who actually knew Alexander or who gathered information from men who served with Alexander were all lost.[20] Contemporaries who wrote accounts of his life included Alexander's campaign historian Callisthenes, Alexander's generals; Ptolemy and Nearchus, Aristobulus, a junior officer on the campaigns, and Onesicritus, Alexander's chief helmsman. Their works are lost, but later works based on these original sources have survived. The earliest of these is Diodorus Siculus (1st century BC), followed by Quintus Curtius Rufus (mid-to-late 1st century AD), Arrian (1st to 2nd century AD), the biographer Plutarch (1st to 2nd century AD), and finally Justin, whose work dated as late as the 4th century.[20] Of these, Arrian is generally considered the most reliable, given that he used Ptolemy and Aristobulus as his sources, closely followed by Diodorus.[20]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Alexander III of Macedon (Greek: Ἀλέξανδρος ὁ Μέγας, romanized: Aléxandros ho Mégas, meaning "protector of men"; born 356 BCE in Pella, ancient Macedonia – died 323 BCE in Babylon), commonly known as Alexander the Great, was king of the ancient Greek who reigned from 336 to 323 BCE. He created through relentless military conquests. Inheriting a professionalized army from his father (Greek: Φίλιππος Βʹ, romanized: Phílippos Βʹ), Alexander launched expeditions starting in 334 BCE that overthrew the , defeating King in decisive battles at the Granicus River, Issus, and Gaugamela, before pushing eastward to the Indus Valley. His empire at its height encompassed approximately two million square miles (5.2 million square kilometers), stretching from the Balkans through Asia Minor, Egypt, Mesopotamia, Persia, and Central Asia to parts of modern-day Pakistan, marking one of the largest territorial expanses achieved by any ancient ruler up to that point. Remaining undefeated in major pitched battles, Alexander's tactical innovations, such as rapid maneuvers and combined arms tactics involving phalanx infantry, cavalry charges, and siege engineering—like the causeway built against Tyre—enabled victories against numerically superior foes through superior leadership and adaptability. He founded over twenty cities, many bearing his name, which served as administrative centers and outposts for Greek settlers, fostering the diffusion of Hellenic culture, language, and governance across conquered territories in what became known as the Hellenistic Age. However, his policies of integrating Persian nobility into his court and adopting eastern customs provoked resentment among Macedonian veterans, contributing to mutinies and highlighting tensions in sustaining unity over such vast domains. Alexander died at age 32, leaving no clear successor and triggering the fragmentation of his empire among his generals, the , whose wars reshaped the Near East for centuries. Ancient accounts, drawn from lost contemporaries like Callisthenes and Ptolemy but preserved in later works by Arrian and Plutarch, blend factual campaigns with legendary embellishments, reflecting Macedonian propaganda and the challenges of reconstructing events from biased court sources centuries removed from the events.

Early Life

Birth and Lineage

Alexander III of Macedon, known as Alexander the Great, was born in 356 BC in Pella (Πέλλα), the capital of the ancient Greek kingdom of Macedon. His birth occurred during the month of Hecatombaeon (Ἑκατομβαίων, Hekatombaion) in the Macedonian calendar, corresponding to July in the modern Gregorian system, though ancient accounts vary slightly on the precise day, with Plutarch specifying the sixth of the Macedonian month Loüs. Alexander's father was the Greek king Philip II of Macedon from 359 BC, who expanded the kingdom's power through military reforms and conquests, including the unification of Greek city-states under Macedonian hegemony. His mother, Olympias (Ancient Greek: Ὀλυμπιάς; originally named Myrtale), was a princess of the Molossian tribe in Epirus (Ancient Greek: Ἤπειρος), daughter of Neoptolemus I (Ancient Greek: Νεοπτόλεμος), king of Epirus, whom Philip married in 357 BC as part of a strategic alliance. Olympias, known for her devotion to Dionysian cults and oracular practices, exerted significant influence in the Macedonian court and promoted narratives linking Alexander's conception to divine intervention, such as visions of thunderbolts or serpents, as recorded in Plutarch's account drawing from earlier historians like Cleitarchus. The Argead royal house, to which Alexander belonged through both parents, traced its legendary paternal lineage to Heracles, the Greek hero son of Zeus, a claim propagated by Macedonian kings to legitimize their rule and connect to pan-Hellenic mythology; Heracles was invoked in royal symbolism, such as the Heracleidae founder Temenus from whom the dynasty purportedly descended. On his maternal side, Alexander's ancestry linked to Achilles through the Molossian kings, who claimed descent from Neoptolemus (also called Pyrrhus), Achilles' son by Deidamia, enabling Alexander to emulate the Iliadic hero in his personal ethos and campaigns. These mythic genealogies, while unverified by empirical evidence and serving propagandistic purposes, were central to Alexander's self-conception and royal ideology, as evidenced in ancient biographies like those of Plutarch and Arrian, which rely on contemporary court traditions and lost eyewitness accounts such as those of Ptolemy and Aristobulus.

Education and Formative Influences

Alexander received his initial instruction from Leonidas of Epirus, a kinsman of his mother Olympias, who emphasized physical rigor, teaching him mathematics, horsemanship, archery, and the endurance of hardships through a spartan regimen that included limited luxuries such as incense during sacrifices. Lysimachus of Acarnania complemented this with literary and dramatic methods, engaging Alexander's imagination by role-playing scenes from Homer where he cast the youth as Achilles and himself as the tutor Phoenix, fostering an early affinity for heroic archetypes. In 343 BC, at age 13, appointed , then in his early 40s, as Alexander's primary tutor, stationing him at near Pella to educate the prince and select companions—including future generals like , , and —for approximately three years until 340 BC. 's curriculum encompassed philosophy, ethics, politics, literature, medicine, and natural sciences, aiming to cultivate rational governance alongside intellectual breadth, though primary accounts like Plutarch note Alexander's selective absorption, prioritizing heroic ideals over systematic empiricism. This scholarly grounding intertwined with martial formation under , who involved Alexander in military drills and campaigns from adolescence; by age 10, Alexander demonstrated equestrian prowess by taming the horse Bucephalus, and at 18, he commanded the left wing of the Macedonian cavalry at the Battle of Chaeronea in 338 BC, contributing decisively to victory over the Greek city-states. Formative literary influences centered on Homer's Iliad, which annotated for Alexander in what became known as the "Iliad of the Casket," instilling admiration for Achilles as a model of martial glory and personal excellence; Alexander reportedly kept this copy, along with his dagger, beneath his pillow during campaigns, considering it the viaticum of military virtue according to Plutarch citing Onesicritus, symbolizing his admiration for the Homeric heroic ideal as inspiration for his conquests and his constant vigilance as a warrior ready to defend himself, reflecting its enduring psychological imprint amid the pragmatic realpolitik of his father's Argead dynasty. The Greek Olympias further shaped his worldview through tales of divine descent from Zeus and Heracles, reinforcing ambitions of transcendent kingship, while 's example of state-building through conquest provided causal templates for expansionist realism.

Rise to Power

Regency and Philip II's Campaigns

In 340 BC, Philip II of Macedon launched a campaign against the cities of Perinthus and Byzantium, which had rebelled with Persian support, prompting him to appoint his 16-year-old son Alexander as regent to govern Macedonia in his absence. During this regency, the Thracian tribe of the Maedi revolted in the upper Strymon valley, seizing the opportunity of Philip's absence to challenge Macedonian authority; Alexander responded by assembling an army, invading their territory, defeating the rebels in battle, and capturing their principal settlement. He razed the town, renamed it Alexandropolis in his honor, expelled the Maedi inhabitants, and resettled it with Macedonian and Greek colonists to secure the frontier. Philip's broader campaigns during this period focused on consolidating Macedonian dominance in the Balkans and Greece, including earlier expeditions into Thrace and Illyria that had subdued restive tribes and expanded territory, though Alexander's direct involvement prior to 340 BC was limited to training and advisory roles under Philip's command. By 338 BC, father and son campaigned together against a Greek alliance led by Athens and Thebes, which sought to curb Macedonian expansion; at the Battle of Chaeronea in Boeotia, Philip positioned the Macedonian phalanx on the right wing to feign weakness and draw in the enemy, while entrusting Alexander with commanding the elite Companion cavalry on the left flank opposite the Theban Sacred Band, an elite infantry unit of 300 paired warriors renowned for their discipline. Alexander's cavalry charge shattered the Sacred Band, killing or capturing most of its members—including its commanders—and enabling the Macedonian infantry to rout the Athenian and Theban forces, with Greek casualties estimated at over 1,000 dead and 2,000 prisoners compared to minimal Macedonian losses. This victory, achieved through Philip's tactical innovations like the extended sarissa pike phalanx and Alexander's aggressive flanking maneuver, ended Greek resistance to Macedonian hegemony and paved the way for the League of Corinth, a confederation under Philip's leadership that unified Greek states for the planned invasion of Persia. Alexander's performance at Chaeronea demonstrated his emerging military prowess, earning public praise from Philip despite underlying familial tensions.

Accession and Consolidation in Greece

Alexander III ascended to the Macedonian throne in October 336 BC following the assassination of his father, Philip II, during the wedding celebrations of Philip's daughter Cleopatra at Aegae. The Macedonian army, assembled for the event, acclaimed the 20-year-old Alexander as king without immediate opposition, reflecting his prior military experience and the loyalty cultivated under Philip's reforms. Alexander's mother, Olympias, reportedly influenced the purge of Philip's last wife, Cleopatra Eurydice, and her infant daughter Europa, to eliminate any competing claims through that lineage, though ancient sources vary on the direct involvement of Alexander or Olympias. To consolidate power within Macedonia, Alexander targeted potential rivals and conspirators linked to the assassination. He executed his cousin Amyntas IV, a prior claimant to the throne whom Philip had spared but kept under watch. Three sons of Aeropus, princes from Lyncestis, were implicated in the plot against Philip; two were promptly executed, while the third, Alexander of Lyncestis, was spared temporarily due to his proclaimed loyalty and service in Asia. General Attalus, uncle to Cleopatra Eurydice and commander of Macedonian forces in Asia, was assassinated on Alexander's orders at the instigation of Parmenion, averting a potential challenge from that faction. These actions, numbering several executions among nobility and relatives, neutralized internal threats and demonstrated Alexander's decisive authority, though they drew criticism from later historians like Quintus Curtius Rufus for their ruthlessness. With Macedonian stability secured, Alexander turned to Greece, where Philip's hegemony via the League of Corinth faced tests of loyalty post-assassination. In late 336 BC, he marched south, convening the league's synod at Corinth, where member states—spanning most Greek poleis except Sparta—reaffirmed Macedonian leadership and elected Alexander as strategos autokrator for the pan-Hellenic campaign against Persia, a project inherited from Philip. This consolidation preserved the league's structure of mutual defense pacts and tribute obligations, ensuring Greek contingents for the Asian expedition while quelling murmurs of independence; envoys from city-states, including Athens and Thebes, submitted to his authority without overt resistance at this stage. Alexander appointed Antipater as viceroy in Macedonia and Greece to maintain order during his preparations, distributing 10,000 talents from royal treasuries to fund alliances and garrisons. By early 335 BC, this diplomatic and military maneuvering had reimposed Philip's framework, positioning Alexander to redirect resources toward invasion while deferring deeper unrest until the subsequent Theban revolt.

Suppression of Theban Revolt

Upon ascending the throne following Philip II's assassination in 336 BC, Alexander faced immediate challenges to Macedonian hegemony over Greece, including unrest in Thebes, a city-state historically resistant to Macedonian influence. In spring 335 BC, while Alexander campaigned northward against Illyrian and Thracian tribes to secure his rear before invading Persia, false rumors spread that he had been killed in battle, emboldening Theban leaders—who had long chafed under the terms of the League of Corinth—to expel the Macedonian garrison and demolish its quarters. Thebes also appealed for support from anti-Macedonian factions, including possible Persian agents and democratic elements invoking pan-Hellenic resistance, though no significant external aid materialized before Alexander's response. Alexander, having concluded his northern operations, force-marched southward approximately 240 miles from the Danube region to Boeotia in under two weeks, arriving outside Thebes unannounced on or around October 335 BC and catching the rebels off guard. He demanded the surrender of Theban instigators, including those advocating independence from Macedonian oversight, but the Theban assembly, dominated by anti-Macedonian partisans, defiantly refused and prepared for defense within their walls, bolstered by a small contingent of Greek mercenaries and allies from nearby states. With an army estimated at 3,000 Macedonian heavy infantry, supported by Thessalian cavalry and allied Greek troops, Alexander initiated a brief siege, employing rams and siege towers to breach the Cadmea gate after initial assaults met fierce resistance, including the loss of about 70 Macedonian archers in probing attacks. The ensuing street fighting was brutal, with Theban forces—outnumbered and lacking the phalanx cohesion of Macedonian troops—offering prolonged resistance in the city's narrow lanes before being overwhelmed. Macedonian victory came swiftly, resulting in over 6,000 Theban combatants and civilians killed during the assault and massacre that followed, per accounts from ancient historians like Diodorus Siculus. Approximately 30,000 survivors were enslaved and distributed as booty to loyal Greek allies, while the city itself was systematically razed—its buildings, homes, and fortifications demolished—sparing only religious sanctuaries and the house of the poet Pindar, whose works Alexander admired. To legitimize the destruction, Alexander convened representatives from the League of Corinth, who voted to condemn Thebes as a cautionary example, razing it to the ground and dividing its territory among compliant Boeotian cities like Orchomenus and Plataea. This suppression, marked by minimal Macedonian casualties relative to the Theban toll, effectively quelled Greek dissent, as cities like Athens—initially sympathetic to Thebes—hastened to reaffirm loyalty, enabling Alexander to redirect focus to his Persian expedition without further internal threats. The event underscored Alexander's strategic ruthlessness in prioritizing operational security through exemplary deterrence, though ancient sources vary slightly on exact figures, with Diodorus emphasizing the scale of plunder and enslavement to highlight the punitive intent.

Persian Conquests

Invasion of Asia Minor

In spring 334 BC, Alexander crossed the Hellespont from Europe into Asia Minor near Sestus and Abydos with a Macedonian-led army estimated at 32,000–40,000 infantry and 4,500–5,100 cavalry, supplemented by allied Greek contingents and siege equipment transported by a fleet of over 160 ships. The crossing fulfilled a long-standing Greek ambition to retaliate against Persian invasions centuries earlier, while strategically bypassing Persian naval superiority by relying on land forces. Advancing eastward through the Troad region toward Hellespontine Phrygia, Alexander encountered Persian satrapal forces under regional commanders including Arsites, Arsames, Spithridates, and Rhodians' Memnon at the Granicus River (modern Biga Çayı) in May or June 334 BC. The Persians, numbering perhaps 10,000–20,000 cavalry and a smaller infantry contingent including Greek mercenaries, held a defensive position along the riverbank, rejecting Alexander's demand for surrender. In the ensuing battle, Alexander personally led a daring cavalry assault across the steep-banked river, nearly being killed before Cleitus the Black intervened; his Companion cavalry broke the Persian center, routing the satraps' forces and killing key leaders, while Parmenion's phalanx enveloped the flanks. Macedonian losses were light, around 115–130 dead (mostly cavalry), compared to heavy Persian casualties of approximately 1,000 cavalry and 2,000 infantry killed, with up to 20,000 prisoners taken, many Greek mercenaries executed for serving the Persians. The victory at Granicus secured northwestern Asia Minor, allowing Alexander to accept the surrender of key Lydian cities like Sardis, where he installed loyal satraps and garrisoned Persian treasuries holding vast wealth. He proceeded southward along the Aegean coast, liberating Ionian Greek cities such as Ephesus from oligarchic pro-Persian regimes, restoring democratic institutions, and using their resources to bolster his fleet against Memnon's remaining Persian navy. In Caria, Ada of Alinda submitted voluntarily, granting Alexander regional authority and enabling further advances into Lycia and Pamphylia, where local dynasts yielded with minimal resistance, providing additional ships and supplies. At Miletus, the last Persian naval base in the west, Alexander besieged the city in late 334 BC after its garrison resisted; he stormed the harbors, sank or captured much of the Persian fleet, and executed resisting mercenaries. Halicarnassus, defended by Memnon and his son Nearchus, underwent a prolonged siege through autumn 334 BC, involving artillery bombardment and mining; though Memnon escaped by sea to continue guerrilla operations, Alexander razed the fortifications and appointed Ada as nominal ruler before turning inland to avoid prolonged coastal entanglements. During winter 334–333 BC, Alexander marched northeast into Phrygia, reaching Gordium, where he famously severed the intricate Gordian Knot tied to an ancient wagon, interpreting it as fulfilling a prophecy of Asian conquest. He reorganized his forces, incorporating reinforcements, and subdued Paphlagonian and Cappadocian tribes en route eastward, establishing control over central Anatolia's highlands and passes without major battles, thus opening the path toward Cilicia and the Syrian gates. These operations dismantled Persian satrapal authority in Asia Minor, freeing Greek poleis and integrating local resources into the Macedonian campaign logistics.

Battles of Issus and Gaugamela

Following victories at the Granicus River in 334 BC and the consolidation of western Asia Minor, Alexander advanced southward into Cilicia in 333 BC, where intelligence indicated Persian King Darius III was assembling forces to contest his invasion. The Macedonian army, comprising approximately 41,000 infantry and 6,000 cavalry, navigated the narrow coastal passes near Issus, only to discover Darius had outmaneuvered them by crossing the Cilician Gates and occupying the advantageous terrain behind. The battlefield, confined by the Pinarus River to the east and the sea to the west, limited the effectiveness of the Persian numerical superiority, estimated by ancient accounts at over 100,000 but likely inflated for propagandistic effect, with modern analyses suggesting a more realistic force of 50,000 to 100,000 including significant Greek mercenary contingents numbering around 30,000. On November 5, 333 BC, Alexander deployed his phalanx in the center against Darius' royal guard, with Parmenion holding the left flank near the sea while the Companion cavalry under Alexander targeted the Persian right. Darius positioned his army with chariots and infantry in the center, but the terrain negated scythed chariot charges, and his decision to fight in a bottleneck rather than open plains constrained his cavalry's mobility. Alexander's oblique advance feigned weakness on the left to draw Persian attention, allowing him to lead a decisive cavalry thrust through the center, shattering the Greek mercenaries and forcing Darius to flee eastward, abandoning his mother, wife, and children to capture. Macedonian losses were minimal, around 150 killed, while Persian casualties exceeded 10,000 with 20,000 prisoners, though exact figures derive from pro-Macedonian sources like Arrian and are subject to exaggeration. The battle's outcome stemmed from Alexander's tactical flexibility and personal leadership contrasting Darius' rigid formation and premature flight, which triggered a general rout despite initial Persian pressure on the Macedonian left. After Issus, Alexander pursued Darius briefly but prioritized securing his supply lines by besieging coastal strongholds, capturing Darius' family and using their custody to undermine Persian morale without immediate execution, treating them honorably to contrast with Achaemenid customs. Darius offered terms including cession of Asia Minor and ransom, which Alexander rejected, interpreting the victory as heralding total conquest. Over the next two years, Alexander subdued Phoenicia and Egypt, receiving divine honors at Ammon's oracle, while Darius rebuilt his army with reinforcements from across the empire. By 331 BC, Darius chose an open plain near Gaugamela (modern Iraq) to deploy his full strength, ordering the ground leveled for 200 scythed chariots and massed cavalry, amassing perhaps 100,000 to 250,000 troops per ancient estimates, though reliability suffers from similar inflationary biases in Macedonian historiography emphasizing divine favor and heroism. On October 1, 331 BC, Alexander's reinforced army of about 47,000 faced Darius' host at dawn, employing an extended phalanx to match the Persian front while holding reserves for maneuver. Darius launched chariot assaults, neutralized by Macedonian agility in opening ranks, followed by cavalry wings attempting envelopment, but Parmenion's steadfast left flank and Alexander's feigned retreat on the right lured Persian reserves away, exposing the center. Alexander then charged with companions through the gap, routing the imperial guard and again compelling Darius to abandon his chariot and flee, precipitating collapse as satraps like Mazaeus shifted allegiance or withdrew. Macedonian dead numbered under 100, with Persian losses in the tens of thousands amid chaotic flight, opening Mesopotamia and the Persian heartland to invasion. The engagement underscored causal factors like Macedonian cohesion and innovation in combined arms—phalanx anchoring assaults by heavy cavalry—against a Persian reliance on quantity and terror tactics ill-suited to disciplined foes, with Darius' repeated personal flight eroding command integrity despite his strategic preparations.

Sieges in the Levant and Egypt

Following the victory at Issus in November 333 BC, Alexander advanced southward along the Phoenician coast to secure naval bases and prevent Persian counterattacks from the sea. Most coastal cities, including Sidon, submitted without resistance, providing ships to bolster the Macedonian fleet. Tyre, however, refused surrender, citing religious obligations to Apollo and distrust of Alexander's intentions after the city's prior loyalty to Persia; its defenders killed or expelled pro-Macedonian envoys, prompting Alexander to besiege the island fortress. The Siege of Tyre, commencing in January 332 BC, lasted seven months and tested Macedonian engineering against the city's 50-foot-high walls and natural defenses. With an army of approximately 35,000–40,000, Alexander constructed a 200-foot-wide causeway (mole) from rubble and debris to connect the mainland to the island, a distance of half a mile, while his fleet blockaded the harbors. Tyrian sorties disrupted progress, sinking ships and destroying initial siege towers, but Macedonian forces adapted by building larger towers on double-decked ships equipped with rams and catapults. After breaching the walls in late July, fierce street fighting ensued; the city fell on July 30, 332 BC, following the capture of the southern harbor. In retaliation for the envoys' deaths and prolonged resistance, Alexander ordered the massacre of 6,000–8,000 Tyrian combatants and civilians, with 2,000 survivors crucified along the shore; approximately 30,000 inhabitants were enslaved, though those in Heracles' temple were spared. Macedonian casualties numbered around 400 killed and 6,000 wounded, reflecting the siege's intensity but also the effectiveness of Alexander's tactics. The victory neutralized Persian naval power in the east and yielded 80 Phoenician triremes, enabling unchallenged progress southward. Alexander then marched to Gaza in October 332 BC, the last Persian stronghold blocking Egypt, defended by satrap Batis with 10,000 troops atop a 100-foot mound fortified with sand. The two-month siege involved undermining the walls with tunnels, deploying siege towers, and artillery bombardment, overcoming Gaza's elevated position and Batis's scorched-earth tactics outside the city. Alexander personally led the assault, sustaining a shoulder wound from a ballista bolt, but forced entry after filling ditches with debris and rubble. Batis was captured and crucified—reportedly dragged behind a chariot in emulation of Achilles' treatment of Hector—while most defenders were killed or enslaved. With Gaza secured, Alexander entered Egypt in late 332 BC without further sieges or battles, as Persian governor Mazaces surrendered Pelusium and Memphis peacefully, and local priests welcomed him as liberator from Persian rule. He adopted pharaonic titles, visited the Siwa Oasis oracle in spring 331 BC to confirm his divine status, and founded Alexandria near the Nile Delta as a Hellenistic outpost, integrating Egyptian and Greek elements in administration while respecting local temples. This bloodless conquest facilitated supply lines and positioned Alexander for the Mesopotamian phase of his campaign.

Pursuit into Persia and Central Asia

Following the Battle of Gaugamela in October 331 BCE, Darius III fled eastward with a small bodyguard, abandoning his family and treasury, while Alexander secured the Mesopotamian capitals, including Babylon, which surrendered without resistance. Alexander then advanced to Susa in December 331 BCE, seizing vast treasures estimated at 40,000 talents of gold and silver, before marching toward Persepolis, the ceremonial heart of the Achaemenid Empire. En route, his forces defeated Ariobarzanes' rearguard at the Persian Gates in January 330 BCE, a narrow pass where the Persians employed ambushes and rockfalls, inflicting significant casualties before being overrun. Upon reaching Persepolis in early 330 BCE, Alexander's army looted the treasury, which held approximately 120,000 talents, before he ordered the burning of the palace complex—accounts differ on intent, with some attributing it to revenge for Xerxes' destruction of Athens in 480 BCE, others to a drunken revel or strategic symbolism to end Achaemenid rule. Learning of Darius's flight toward the eastern satrapies, Alexander pursued relentlessly from Persepolis to Ecbatana, covering over 300 miles in summer 330 BCE, subduing Median and Persian loyalists en route. Darius, weakened and betrayed by his satraps, was arrested by Bessus, satrap of Bactria, who proclaimed himself king as Artaxerxes V and stabbed Darius in early July 330 BCE; Alexander arrived shortly after, finding Darius dying in a covered wagon, to whom he promised vengeance and a royal burial. Alexander interred Darius with honors before turning against Bessus, campaigning through Hyrcania and the Caspian region in late 330 BCE, where he quelled tribal unrest and secured supply lines amid harsh terrain and nomadic harassment. By spring 329 BCE, he crossed the Hindu Kush into Bactria, defeating Bessus's forces and capturing him near the Oxus River after locals betrayed him for rewards; Bessus was mutilated—nose and ears severed per Persian custom for regicides—and executed in Ecbatana the following year. Resistance persisted in Bactria and Sogdiana, where chieftains like Oxyartes fortified mountain strongholds; Alexander married Oxyartes's daughter Roxana in 328 BCE to forge alliances, but faced prolonged guerrilla warfare led by Spitamenes, who ambushed Macedonian foraging parties, culminating in the Battle of the Polytimetus River where 2,000 Scythian cavalry were routed. To break Sogdian defiance, Alexander besieged the "Sogdian Rock" in early 327 BCE, a sheer 15,000-foot peak near the Oxus holding 30,000 defenders including families of Greek mercenaries; recruiting 300 agile climbers and promising them the women atop as incentive, he scaled the cliffs undetected at night, prompting surrender upon dawn revelation of vulnerability. Similar tactics subdued the Rock of Chorienes, another impregnable fortress, through feigned assaults and climber assaults, yielding vast livestock and hostages. By mid-327 BCE, these operations pacified Central Asia up to the Jaxartes River, establishing garrisons at cities like Alexandria Eschate (modern Khujand), though at the cost of heavy attrition from attrition warfare, disease, and desertions, with Spitamenes ultimately killed by his own allies. This phase extended Macedonian control over satrapies from Media to the Amu Darya, blending coercion with pragmatic satrap appointments to integrate local elites.

Indian Campaign and Army Revolt

In 326 BC, after subduing resistant tribes in the Punjab region following his crossing of the Hindu Kush mountains in 327 BC, Alexander's army confronted the kingdom of King Porus along the Hydaspes River (modern Jhelum River). Porus commanded a formidable force including war elephants, which posed a novel challenge to Macedonian phalanx tactics accustomed to Persian cavalry and infantry. Alexander's troops numbered approximately 40,000-50,000, including infantry, cavalry, and allied contingents, while Porus fielded an army estimated at 20,000-30,000 infantry, 2,000-4,000 cavalry, and up to 200-300 elephants. The Battle of the Hydaspes occurred in May 326 BC amid heavy monsoon rains that flooded the river, complicating Alexander's crossing. To outmaneuver Porus, Alexander detached a force under Craterus to hold the main position while he led a flanking detachment of about 15,000 infantry and 4,000 cavalry across the swollen river at night, using rafts and skins for flotation. This surprise maneuver allowed Alexander to strike Porus's left flank, where his cavalry routed the Indian horsemen, and the Macedonian hypaspists and Companion cavalry disrupted the elephant lines, causing the beasts to panic and trample their own ranks. Porus fought valiantly atop an elephant until wounded and captured; ancient accounts report Indian casualties of 12,000 killed and 9,000 captured, with Macedonian losses ranging from 200 to 1,000 dead, marking one of Alexander's costliest victories due to the terrain and elephant charges. Impressed by Porus's resistance and leadership, Alexander reinstated him as satrap of his territories, expanding the domain as a reward, and incorporated Indian troops, including elephants, into his army. This pragmatic alliance facilitated further advances eastward, where Alexander subdued additional chieftains and received submissions from regions along the Acesines (Chenab) and Hydraotes (Ravi) rivers. By June 326 BC, the army reached the Hyphasis River (modern Beas), where scouts reported vast kingdoms beyond, including the Nanda Empire with armies reputedly numbering 200,000 infantry, 20,000 cavalry, and 3,000-6,000 elephants—figures that, even if exaggerated, underscored the escalating scale of opposition. At the Hyphasis, the Macedonian veterans, hardened by over a decade of continuous campaigning since 334 BC, mutinied against further eastward marches. Exhaustion from relentless marches, wounds, diseases, and the oppressive monsoon climate eroded morale; soldiers cited separation from homeland—over 10,000 kilometers distant—harsh terrain, unfamiliar foes with superior numbers of elephants, and diminishing prospects of return as decisive factors. Coenus, a senior general, articulated the troops' plea, arguing that further conquests risked overextension without sustainable supply lines, prompting Alexander to retreat to his tent in feigned anger for three days. Facing unified refusal, Alexander relented, erecting altars to the gods as symbolic boundary markers before ordering a westward pivot along the Hydaspes and Indus rivers toward the sea.

Imperial Administration

Governance and Cultural Fusion Policies

Alexander maintained the Achaemenid satrapal system as the backbone of imperial administration, dividing conquered territories into provinces governed by satraps responsible for tax collection, order maintenance, and policy enforcement. Initially, following conquests, he replaced Persian satraps with Macedonians to ensure loyalty, such as appointing Calas in Hellespontine Phrygia around 334 BC, but after Gaugamela in 331 BC, he shifted toward appointing more Persians to leverage local expertise and foster integration, exemplified by Mazaeus as satrap of Babylon in 331 BC. This pragmatic retention of Persian structures minimized disruption while centralizing ultimate authority under Alexander, who conducted royal inspections and intervened in cases of maladministration, executing satraps like Cleomenes in Memphis for corruption. In regions like Egypt, governance blended Greek oversight with respect for indigenous institutions; Alexander confirmed Egyptian priests' privileges and appointed Cleomenes, a Greek, as satrap around 332 BC, while honoring pharaonic traditions by funding temple restorations at Memphis. Financial secretaries (oikonomoi) like Harpalus managed treasuries empire-wide, standardizing coinage and logistics from bases in Babylon and Ecbatana, ensuring revenues from royal lands and taxes supported military campaigns without overhauling local economies. Alexander's cultural fusion policies aimed to unify his diverse empire by merging Macedonian-Greek and Persian elites, though they provoked Macedonian resistance due to perceived erosion of traditional privileges. In 324 BC at Susa, he orchestrated mass weddings uniting about 90 Macedonian officers, including Hephaestion and Craterus, with Persian noblewomen, while himself marrying Darius III's daughter Stateira and Artaxerxes III's granddaughter Parysatis, providing dowries and incentives to promote intermarriage as a tool for loyalty and succession blending. This followed his adoption of Persian royal attire after 330 BC and advocacy for proskynesis—a ritual prostration before the king—as a court protocol, which he justified as honoring divinity but which Macedonians viewed as servile and un-Greek, leading to refusals and philosophical debates at banquets. Military integration advanced fusion by incorporating Persians into the army; post-Susa, Alexander trained 30,000 Persian youths (epigonoi) in Macedonian phalanx tactics from 327 BC, deploying them alongside veterans, and formed hybrid units like Persian Successors replacing retired Companions. City foundations, such as Alexandria in Egypt (331 BC) and over 70 others, seeded Greek settlers and institutions like theaters and gymnasia, facilitating Hellenization, yet Alexander also restored Persian temples and employed local administrators, creating a synthesis that persisted beyond his death despite elite-level tensions evident in the Opis mutiny of 324 BC, where troops protested Persian promotions until appeased with bonuses and shared banquets. These measures reflected causal incentives for stability in a multi-ethnic realm rather than ideological universalism, as Macedonian backlash underscored limits to rapid assimilation.

Economic Measures and Coinage Reforms

Alexander's economic measures emphasized leveraging captured Persian wealth to fund his expeditions while minimizing impositions on Greek subjects, thereby sustaining military efforts without broad tax hikes on allied territories. He exempted Greek cities in Asia Minor from tribute, relying instead on plunder and existing Persian levies from non-Greek regions to generate revenue, which ancient sources describe as an effective and equitable approach relative to prior systems. This policy, informed by efficient collection practices, allowed surpluses that supported salaries, welfare, and logistics for his army of over 40,000 men, with daily wages averaging one drachma per soldier. Total revenues from treasures, taxes, and spoils exceeded 8.41 billion drachmae over the campaign, dwarfing initial Macedonian reserves of around 70 talents of silver. Central to these efforts were coinage reforms that transformed hoarded bullion into circulating currency, creating the empire's first unified monetary zone. After seizing treasuries—such as 50,000 talents at Susa in 331 BC, 120,000 at Persepolis, and 180,000 at Ecbatana—Alexander ordered the melting of Persian darics and siglos into standardized Greek coins, injecting liquidity equivalent to billions in modern terms. He adopted the Attic standard for silver tetradrachms (approximately 17.2 grams of silver each), depicted with Heracles (symbolizing his Argead lineage) on the obverse and Zeus on the reverse, while minting gold staters on a comparable weight. Mints proliferated from Pella to Babylon and Egypt, producing millions of these coins, which superseded local currencies and Persian gold, fostering trade cohesion across regions from the Mediterranean to India. These reforms extended to administrative innovations, such as appointing specialists like Cleomenes in Egypt to oversee monetization and resource exploitation, including early coin strikes that stimulated local economies. Infrastructure investments, including founded cities like Alexandria (331 BC) as trade hubs, harbors, and roads, complemented the coinage by enhancing commerce routes and agricultural output, though the monetary influx contributed to inflation, evidenced by wheat prices in Athens rising from 5 to 16 drachmae per medimnos by 330 BC amid heightened demand. Overall, the system prioritized military solvency and economic integration over redistributive taxation, laying foundations for Hellenistic monetary standards that endured for centuries.

Handling of Conspiracies and Internal Dissent

Alexander's response to suspected conspiracies was characterized by swift and severe measures, often involving torture, execution, and preemptive elimination of potential threats to his authority. In 330 BCE, following the revelation of a plot led by Dimnos, a Macedonian officer, Alexander targeted Philotas, the son of his longtime general Parmenion and commander of the Companion Cavalry. Philotas was accused of prior knowledge of the conspiracy but failing to report it, which Alexander interpreted as complicity; under torture, he confessed, leading to his execution by stoning or spearing by the army assembly. Fearing retaliation, Alexander simultaneously dispatched orders to execute Parmenion in Ecbatana, where the veteran general was killed while reading a forged letter from his son; this act eliminated a powerful figure whose influence and past counsel had occasionally clashed with Alexander's ambitions, though direct evidence of Parmenion's involvement remains debated among ancient sources like Curtius Rufus and Arrian. Subsequent incidents reflected growing paranoia amid cultural fusion policies that alienated Macedonian elites. In 328 BCE, during a banquet in Maracanda, Alexander slew Cleitus the Black, a loyal officer who had saved his life at the Granicus River in 334 BCE, after Cleitus criticized the king's adoption of Persian customs and perceived favoritism toward barbarians over Macedonians. Alexander, in a drunken rage, impaled Cleitus with a spear; overcome by remorse, he reportedly attempted suicide before being restrained, highlighting the tension between his autocratic style and traditional Macedonian freedoms. This event underscored Alexander's intolerance for public dissent, even from trusted companions, as Cleitus's outspokenness echoed broader resentments over proskynesis and orientalization. The Pages' Conspiracy of 327 BCE further illustrated Alexander's ruthless consolidation of power. A group of royal pages, including Hermolaus, plotted to assassinate Alexander during a hunt, reportedly motivated by Hermolaus's humiliation after being whipped for violating hunting protocol by killing a boar before the king. The plot was uncovered when one conspirator, Antipater (son of the regent), informed authorities; the pages were castrated, flogged, and stoned to death by fellow Macedonians. Alexander implicated the philosopher Callisthenes, Aristotle's nephew and his former court historian, who opposed proskynesis; Callisthenes was imprisoned and later executed or died in chains, effectively silencing intellectual opposition. Ancient accounts from Plutarch and Arrian portray this as a genuine regicidal attempt, though some modern analyses question the extent of Callisthenes's involvement, viewing it as a pretext to remove a critic of Alexander's divine pretensions. Internal dissent peaked with military mutinies, which Alexander addressed through a mix of coercion and conciliation. At the Hyphasis River in 326 BCE, after the Battle of the Hydaspes, exhausted troops refused to advance further into India, citing endless campaigns and unfamiliar terrain; Alexander retreated westward after feigning illness and delivering speeches that shamed the army into compliance, though underlying fatigue from overextension persisted. In the summer of 324 BCE, while encamped at Opis on the Tigris, Alexander faced a serious mutiny among his Macedonian veterans. The soldiers were angered by the planned discharge of invalids and older troops, the integration of large numbers of Persian soldiers into Macedonian units, and Alexander’s increasing adoption of Persian court ceremonial (notably proskynesis). Alexander responded with a lengthy speech that simultaneously rebuked the mutineers and reminded them of the conquests and benefits they had gained under his leadership (and Philip II’s before him). The most detailed surviving version is in Arrian’s Anabasis of Alexander 7.9–11, widely regarded by modern scholars as the most reliable account, even though it is a literary composition rather than a verbatim record. Quintus Curtius Rufus (History of Alexander 10.2–4) offers a shorter, more emotionally charged version that stresses Macedonian fears of being supplanted by Persians. Diodorus Siculus (17.109) and Plutarch (Life of Alexander 71) provide briefer accounts that agree on the core sequence: mutiny -> harsh speech -> soldiers’ remorse -> reconciliation. These responses prioritized operational continuity over leniency, reflecting causal pressures of maintaining loyalty in a far-flung empire where perceived weakness could invite collapse.

Personal Life and Character

Physical Appearance and Habits

Plutarch's Life of Alexander provides the primary ancient description of his physique, stating that the outward form is best represented in the statues crafted by Lysippus, the sole sculptor Alexander permitted to portray him, which depict a neck inclined slightly to the left and eyes of melting softness; later traditions in the Alexander Romance report heterochromia—one eye blue, the other brown—interpreted as a mark of divine favor, though this lacks confirmation from contemporary sources. These Lysippus statues and coins from his era portray a youthful, clean-shaven figure with wavy hair and an intense gaze. He had a fair complexion with ruddiness evident on his face and chest, and his skin naturally emitted a pleasant odor, while his mouth and flesh produced a fragrant scent, as noted by the musician Aristoxenus. Arrian, drawing on earlier accounts, describes Alexander as exceptionally handsome, robust, and somewhat less than average height, with no precise measurements recorded in ancient sources; indications of his relative shortness include the need for a footstool when ascending Darius III's throne and Darius's mother mistaking the taller Hephaestion for Alexander after the Battle of Issus; he was capable of enduring severe physical labors without complaint. Curtius Rufus similarly notes his lack of impressive stature, distinguishing him from the tall hero of later legend. Modern estimates place him at approximately 5 feet 5 inches to 5 feet 7 inches (165-170 cm), derived from analyses of contemporary artwork, skeletal data from Macedonian burials indicating average male heights around 162-165 cm, and adjustments for his described robustness. Alexander maintained a disciplined daily routine amid campaigns, rising early for sacrifices followed by a seated breakfast, then dedicating daylight hours to hunting, adjudication of disputes, reading, or administrative duties before late suppers meticulously arranged for companions. He demonstrated extraordinary endurance, frequently marching on foot with his infantry over long distances—up to 20 miles daily in rugged terrain—while forgoing the comfort of a horse or litter, and he engaged in athletic pursuits like archery practice during unhurried advances. In eating, he exercised temperance, favoring modest portions and distributing rare delicacies or exotic imports among friends rather than consuming them himself, with suppers rarely exceeding basic Macedonian fare despite access to vast resources. His habits with wine were more variable; Plutarch asserts he was less prone to addiction than commonly supposed, often using symposia for philosophical discourse or bonding rather than heavy consumption, though his warm, fiery temperament inclined him toward occasional excess. Notable lapses included proposing drinking contests—such as one in 324 BCE at Babylon where participants imbibed vast quantities of unmixed wine, resulting in over 20 deaths from alcohol poisoning—and a drunken altercation leading to the fatal stabbing of his friend Cleitus in 328 BCE. Sleep patterns aligned with his exertions and indulgences, typically brief during active campaigning but extending to midday or full days of recovery following bouts of revelry. These traits underscored a constitution resilient to fatigue and privation, enabling conquests across diverse climates from Greece to India, yet vulnerabilities to choleric outbursts under alcohol's influence.

Personality Traits and Leadership Style

Alexander displayed remarkable personal courage, routinely positioning himself at the forefront of battles and sustaining numerous injuries that underscored his willingness to risk his life alongside his men. At the Granicus River crossing in May 334 BC, he received a severe blow to the head from an axe, cracking his helmet and drawing blood, yet continued fighting. Similarly, during the Battle of Issus in November 333 BC, a Persian lance pierced his thigh, and at the siege of Gaza in 332 BC, he fractured his leg bone after leaping from a scaling ladder. These incidents, drawn from accounts emphasizing his frontline leadership, contributed to his troops' perception of him as a valiant commander who shared their dangers. A quote commonly attributed to him encapsulates this ethos: "Toil and risk are the price of glory, but it is a lovely thing to live with courage and die leaving an everlasting fame," though no verified version from reliable ancient sources such as Arrian or Plutarch includes this phrasing. His leadership style prioritized solidarity with soldiers through shared privations, exemplifying a hands-on approach that preserved unit cohesion over vast distances. In the arid Gedrosian Desert march of late 325 BC, amid widespread thirst, Alexander refused a helmet of water procured for him at great effort, instead pouring it onto the ground before his parched army to demonstrate equal suffering. This gesture, amid a campaign that claimed up to a quarter of his forces from exhaustion and starvation, reinforced his image as an empathetic leader committed to mutual endurance rather than detached command. Charisma defined his ability to inspire and reconcile fractious elements, as seen in his handling of the Opis mutiny in August 324 BC, where Macedonian veterans protested his integration of Persian troops. After executing 13 ringleaders, Alexander addressed the assembly, cataloging his personal exploits—from ascending the throne at 20 to conquering Persia without defeat—and enumerating promotions he had granted from the ranks, including 14 companions elevated to Bodyguard status and over 60 to generalships. He contrasted his divine parentage and relentless risks with the soldiers' gains, prompting them to prostrate themselves in renewed fealty and join a banquet of reconciliation with 9,000 Persian recruits. This persuasive oratory, blending reproach, reciprocity, and vision, exemplified his skill in leveraging personal narrative to restore loyalty. Ruthlessness tempered these qualities, manifesting in decisive reprisals against defiance to maintain imperial authority. Following Thebes's revolt in 335 BC, spurred by rumors of his death, Alexander besieged and stormed the city after two weeks, ordering a massacre that killed approximately 6,000 defenders in the fray, with his allies auctioning 30,000 survivors into slavery while razing all but the temples and the house of poet Pindar. This calculated terror, rooted in suppressing pan-Hellenic resistance, quelled further uprisings but revealed a pragmatic severity prioritizing conquest's momentum over clemency.

Key Relationships and Sexuality

Alexander maintained a close but increasingly strained relationship with his father, Philip II of Macedon, who had appointed Aristotle as his tutor in 343 BC and involved him in military campaigns from age 16, such as the Battle of Chaeronea in 338 BC. Tensions escalated in 337 BC following Philip's marriage to Cleopatra Eurydice, a Macedonian noblewoman, which marginalized Alexander's mother Olympias and led to a public rift, prompting temporary exile for both; reconciliation occurred shortly before Philip's assassination in October 336 BC. His bond with Olympias, a princess of Epirus, was marked by mutual loyalty and her promotion of myths portraying Alexander as the son of Zeus-Ammon rather than Philip, fostering his sense of divine destiny; after Philip's death, Olympias orchestrated the murder of Cleopatra Eurydice and her infant daughter Europa to eliminate rivals, actions Alexander implicitly endorsed by not punishing her. Aristotle tutored Alexander from approximately 343 to 340 BC at Mieza, instilling interests in philosophy, ethics, and Homeric literature, though later divergences emerged, such as Alexander's execution of Callisthenes, Aristotle's nephew, in 327 BC amid conspiracy charges. Among companions, Hephaestion, a nobleman of similar age educated alongside Alexander, served as his closest confidant and second-in-command, mirroring the Achilles-Patroclus dynamic from the Iliad as noted by ancient authors like Plutarch and Arrian; Hephaestion's death from illness in Ecbatana in 324 BC prompted Alexander to order statewide mourning, cremate his body with royal honors, and fast in grief, indicating profound emotional attachment. While some secondary sources infer an erotic element based on Greek cultural norms of male bonding in elite circles, primary accounts like Arrian emphasize platonic friendship without explicit sexual references, and modern analyses caution against anachronistic projections, noting the absence of direct evidence for physical intimacy between the two adults. Alexander also engaged with Bagoas, a Persian eunuch formerly Darius III's concubine, whom he received as a gift around 330 BC; ancient historians Quintus Curtius Rufus and Plutarch describe Bagoas as influencing court decisions and recount an incident at a banquet where Alexander publicly kissed him after a debate, suggesting favoritism, though Arrian omits such details, possibly to idealize Alexander. In terms of sexuality, Alexander married three women for dynastic purposes—Roxana in 327 BC, resulting in son Alexander IV born in 323 BC; and Stateira and Parysatis in a mass wedding at Susa in 324 BC—demonstrating heterosexual unions productive of legitimate heirs, consistent with royal expectations. Male relations, including with Bagoas and potentially Hephaestion, align with documented practices among Macedonian and Greek elites, where homoerotic ties were socially tolerated but not exclusively defining; ancient sources vary, with sensationalist writers like Curtius emphasizing them for dramatic effect, while more restrained ones like Arrian prioritize military virtues over personal scandals, precluding modern labels like "bisexual" as ancients categorized acts by dominance rather than orientation.

Military Achievements

Tactical Innovations and Combined Arms

Alexander the Great's military success relied on a sophisticated system of combined arms warfare, integrating heavy infantry, cavalry, light troops, and siege elements into cohesive operations, an approach refined from his father Philip II's reforms but executed with unprecedented flexibility and decisiveness. The Macedonian phalanx, armed with 18-foot sarissas, formed the core infantry, designed to present a wall of pikes that pinned and disrupted enemy formations, functioning as the "anvil" in the classic tactic. Companion cavalry, elite heavy horsemen numbering around 1,800, served as the "hammer," delivering shock charges to enemy flanks or rear after the phalanx fixed the opponent in place, often led personally by Alexander to exploit breakthroughs. This coordination was facilitated by hypaspists, agile elite infantry who bridged the phalanx and cavalry wings, allowing rapid shifts and preventing gaps in the line. Innovations included the oblique order deployment, where Alexander strengthened one wing—typically his right with cavalry—for a decisive envelopment while refusing the left to avoid overextension, as demonstrated at Chaeronea in 338 BC under Philip but perfected in Alexander's campaigns. He emphasized reserves, such as holding back portions of the phalanx or cavalry for counterattacks, and integrated Thessalian cavalry on the left for defensive reliability against superior numbers. Light auxiliaries, including Agrianians and archers, screened advances, harassed flanks, and disrupted enemy cohesion before main engagement, enhancing the phalanx's vulnerability to missile fire. In sieges, engineers under experts like Diades deployed torsion catapults and mobile towers, combining with infantry assaults for breaches, as at Tyre in 332 BC where naval elements supported land operations. The hammer-and-anvil tactic proved decisive in battles like Issus (333 BC), where the phalanx held Darius III's center while Alexander's cavalry routed the Persian left, pursuing the king and collapsing morale. At Gaugamela (331 BC), despite numerical inferiority, coordinated charges by cavalry exploited gaps created by the phalanx's advance, turning a potentially even fight into a rout. Alexander's doctrine stressed training for seamless transitions between arms, with signals via trumpets and standards ensuring synchronization, minimizing the rigidity of earlier Greek hoplite warfare. This integration not only maximized Macedonian strengths—professionalism and mobility—but exploited Persian weaknesses in command cohesion and overreliance on masses, yielding victories against larger forces throughout his conquests.

Analysis of Major Battles

Alexander's major battles demonstrated his tactical innovation, emphasizing combined arms integration of the Macedonian phalanx, Companion cavalry, and lighter troops to exploit enemy weaknesses. His victories often hinged on bold maneuvers targeting enemy command structures, rapid exploitation of breakthroughs, and adaptability to terrain, rather than numerical superiority. Against Persian forces, which relied on massed cavalry and infantry, Alexander's oblique orders and feigned retreats disrupted cohesion, as seen in analyses of his campaigns. In the Battle of the Granicus River on May 22, 334 BC, Alexander faced Persian satraps with around 20,000 cavalry and infantry positioned behind the riverbank. Ignoring advice for a cautious approach, he led the Companion cavalry in a direct assault across the deep, swift Granicus, targeting the Persian left flank to decapitate command. This risky charge, executed in wedge formation, pierced the Persian cavalry line despite fierce resistance that nearly killed Alexander, buying time for the phalanx to ford and deploy. The Macedonian infantry then overwhelmed the disorganized Persians, resulting in approximately 100 Macedonian losses versus over 1,000 Persian cavalry slain and 2,500 prisoners, including key satraps. This victory secured western Asia Minor by eliminating regional resistance early. The Battle of Issus in November 333 BC pitted Alexander's 40,000-man army against Darius III's larger force of perhaps 100,000 in a narrow coastal plain, limiting Persian chariot and cavalry advantages. Alexander extended his right flank with Thessalian horse to counter Persian numbers, then advanced obliquely to refuse his left under Parmenion while charging the Persian center with hypaspists and Companions. Spotting a gap, he drove toward Darius personally, prompting the Persian king's flight and subsequent rout, despite initial Greek mercenary resistance. Macedonian losses were minimal at around 150, while Persians suffered heavy casualties and left family members captured. This engagement showcased Alexander's exploitation of terrain to negate numbers and psychological focus on the enemy ruler. At Gaugamela on October 1, 331 BC, Darius assembled up to 250,000 troops, including scythed chariots, on a leveled plain near Arbela to maximize mobility. Alexander, with 47,000 infantry and 7,000 cavalry, conducted a night march and feinted leftward with cavalry under Parmenion to draw Persian reserves, creating an echelon formation. During the advance, he wheeled right-center Companions through a gap in Persian lines, shattering the center and pursuing Darius, whose flight triggered collapse. Chariots failed due to Macedonian archers and sarissa walls, yielding Alexander control of the Persian heartland with losses under 1,000 versus massive Persian dead and the treasury intact. Superior discipline and cavalry decisive action overcame Persian quantity. The Battle of the Hydaspes in May 326 BC against King Porus's 30,000 infantry, 4,000 cavalry, and 200 war elephants across the monsoon-swollen Jhelum River highlighted Alexander's deception tactics. Using nightly feints with baggage and lights to mask his main crossing 17 miles upstream, he surprised Porus at dawn with a core force, deploying sarissas to form anti-elephant squares while cavalry outflanked the Indian left. Archers and javelinmen panicked elephants into trampling their own lines, leading to Porus's defeat but honorable reinstatement as ally. Macedonian casualties reached 1,000, yet the victory subdued Punjab, though troop mutiny halted further advance. This battle illustrated adaptation to novel threats like elephants via mobility and combined arms.

Logistical and Strategic Mastery

Alexander's strategic approach emphasized rapid maneuver and decisive engagements to dismantle the Persian Empire's command structure, beginning with the 334 BC invasion across the Hellespont with approximately 45,000 troops aimed at neutralizing Persian naval power through coastal conquests. By securing key ports like Tyre in 332 BC, he gained naval supremacy and resupply capabilities, integrating logistics directly into operational planning to sustain advances over thousands of miles. This enabled maneuvers such as the 333 BC trap at Issus, where intelligence and terrain exploitation forced Darius III into a disadvantageous battle, and the 331 BC Gaugamela engagement, preceded by reconnaissance to identify weaknesses in the Persian line. In India from 327 to 325 BC, Alexander divided forces to secure flanks in northern satrapies before crossing the Hydaspes River against Porus in 326 BC, using feints and night marches informed by scouts to achieve surprise despite monsoon conditions. His grand strategy targeted the enemy's center of gravity—Darius's kingship—through relentless pursuit, as after Issus when he prioritized Mediterranean control over immediate inland chases, ensuring stable bases for further offensives. Logistically, Alexander sustained his army via a lightweight baggage train reliant on pack animals—horses, mules, and camels capable of carrying up to 300 pounds each—banning wagons initially to maximize mobility, a reform inherited and refined from Philip II. A dedicated transport officer, or skoidos (initially Parmenion until 330 BC), oversaw the train's defense, marching order, and animal welfare, with troops carrying 4 to 10 days' provisions to bridge foraging gaps. Supplies were augmented by negotiating with local Persian officials or foraging/sacking resistant areas, wintering in fertile riverine or port-adjacent zones, and establishing magazines like the 329 BC depot at Herat (Alexandria Ariana) to support up to 64,000 troops, 10,000 cavalry horses, and 35,000 followers. Engineering efforts included road construction by surveyors and garrisons functioning as depots and communication nodes along routes from Asia Minor to Mesopotamia, facilitating marches through diverse terrains like the coastal path from Sardis to Egypt. Naval integration, via commanders like Nearchus, provided resupply during the 325 BC Gedrosian Desert traverse, though monsoon delays contributed to heavy losses, underscoring risks in extended operations. Despite later allowances for families increasing train size, initial restrictions on non-combatants preserved the army's speed, enabling conquests from Macedonia to the Indus over a decade.

Death and Immediate Aftermath

Final Campaigns and Illness

Following the conquest of the Achaemenid Empire, Alexander invaded the Indian subcontinent in 327 BC, advancing through the Hindu Kush and subduing tribes such as the Aspasioi and Guraeans before reaching the Indus River. His forces encountered significant resistance, culminating in the Battle of the Hydaspes in May 326 BC against King Porus, where Alexander's tactical use of cavalry and elephants secured victory despite monsoon conditions and Porus's formidable army of infantry, chariots, and war elephants numbering around 20,000 foot soldiers, 2,000 cavalry, and 85 elephants. Impressed by Porus's valor, Alexander reinstated him as a satrap, incorporating Indian troops into his army to bolster numbers for further advances. Pushing eastward, Alexander besieged and captured cities along the Indus, including a severe wounding during the Mallian campaign in late 326 BC when an arrow pierced his lung, nearly proving fatal and temporarily halting operations. At the Hyphasis River (modern Beas) in 326 BC, his exhausted Macedonian veterans mutinied, refusing to proceed further due to battle fatigue, disease, and reports of vast armies ahead, forcing Alexander to feign illness and reluctantly turn back after constructing symbolic altars to mark the eastern limit of his empire. The return journey involved splitting forces: Alexander descended the Indus by land, subduing the Malli and Oxydrakai tribes with brutal efficiency, while Admiral Nearchus led a fleet along the coast from the Hydaspes to the Persian Gulf, mapping the route and enduring shipwrecks and hostile shores. The most disastrous leg was the march through the Gedrosian Desert (modern Makran) from July to October 325 BC, intended to link coastal and inland routes but plagued by extreme heat, lack of water, and logistical failures despite prior provisioning attempts; the column, comprising up to 60,000 personnel including soldiers, camp followers, and pack animals, suffered massive attrition from thirst and exposure, with ancient estimates suggesting three-quarters perished, though modern assessments place combatant losses closer to 15,000. Alexander personally led scouting for water, sharing scant supplies, but the expedition highlighted overambition and inadequate reconnaissance, contrasting his earlier logistical triumphs. Reuniting with Nearchus's fleet at Pura, Alexander proceeded to Susa in early 324 BC, where he orchestrated mass weddings between Macedonian officers and Persian nobility to fuse cultures, marrying Stateira (Darius III's daughter) himself and funding 10,000 unions with bonuses. He then purged corrupt satraps, executed Bessus (Darius's betrayer), and marched to Ecbatana, losing his companion Hephaestion to illness in 324 BC, which prompted extravagant funeral rites and further purges. Arriving in Babylon by spring 323 BC, Alexander planned invasions of Arabia and Carthage but fell ill after a prolonged banquet and excessive wine consumption on June 1, developing a high fever that progressed over 10-12 days with abdominal pain, progressive weakness, delirium, and loss of speech, culminating in his death on June 10 or 11 at age 32 without naming a clear successor.

Theories of Death

Alexander the Great died on June 11, 323 BC, in Babylon after a prolonged illness characterized by high fever, abdominal pain, progressive paralysis, and loss of speech, lasting approximately 10 to 14 days. Ancient historians such as Arrian and Plutarch reported that he initially complained of severe pain after drinking wine at a banquet, followed by fever that worsened despite treatment by his physicians, including attempts to cool him with cold baths. Contemporary suspicions of foul play arose among his companions, who interrogated potential suspects but found no conclusive evidence, leading some to attribute the death to natural causes like an infectious disease prevalent in the marshy Euphrates region. The poisoning theory, prominent since antiquity, posits that Alexander was deliberately administered a toxin, possibly by rivals fearing his plans for further campaigns or succession uncertainties. Advocates suggest poisons like Veratrum album (hellebore), which induces vomiting, diarrhea, and neurological symptoms matching the described progression, could have been sourced from regions Alexander had visited; this is deemed more plausible than arsenic or strychnine due to slower onset aligning with the multi-day illness. Motives implicated figures like Antipater, the Macedonian regent, who reportedly sent a poisoned dose via his son Cassander or physician, amid tensions over Alexander's eastern influences and potential demotions. However, the theory lacks direct evidence, such as confessions or residues, and contemporaries' failure to identify poison despite autopsies and interrogations undermines it; moreover, Alexander's heavy alcohol consumption and prior wounds may have mimicked toxic effects. Among natural causes, typhoid fever emerges as a leading candidate, caused by Salmonella typhi bacteria common in contaminated water sources like Babylon's canals, producing fever, abdominal distress, and potential complications like intestinal perforation or encephalitis that could explain paralysis. Historical records note similar outbreaks in the army, and typhoid's incubation period fits the timeline post-banquet exposure. Alternative infectious theories include malaria, with Plasmodium falciparum inducing cyclic fevers and organ failure, though less consistent with the non-relapsing symptoms reported. West Nile virus encephalitis has been proposed for its neurological sequelae following fever, supported by regional mosquito vectors, but lacks confirmatory serological evidence from the era. Other medical hypotheses involve non-infectious etiologies, such as acute necrotizing pancreatitis triggered by biliary issues and exacerbated by chronic alcohol abuse, leading to systemic inflammation, shock, and multi-organ failure; this aligns with post-drinking onset and autopsy findings of thickened liver in ancient reports. Guillain-Barré syndrome, an autoimmune neuropathy possibly following a viral trigger, could account for ascending paralysis and respiratory compromise, though fever predominance challenges this. Empirical limitations persist due to sparse primary evidence and retrospective diagnostics, rendering definitive causation elusive; typhoid or pancreatitis theories best integrate historical symptoms with environmental and lifestyle factors without invoking unsubstantiated conspiracy.

Succession and Diadochi Wars

Upon Alexander's death in Babylon on June 10 or 11, 323 BC, without designating a successor, his generals—the Diadochi—faced a power vacuum exacerbated by the absence of a mature heir. When asked to whom the empire should go, Alexander reportedly uttered "krateros," interpreted as "to the strongest" (tō kraterō), signaling that rule would be seized by the most capable general rather than inherited peacefully. The assembly of officers compromised by proclaiming joint kingship: Philip III Arrhidaeus, Alexander's intellectually disabled half-brother and son of Philip II, as titular king, with the unborn child of Roxana (Alexander's Bactrian wife) as co-ruler if male; Perdiccas was appointed regent (epirotes) to safeguard the heirs, while a council of somatophylakes oversaw satrapal assignments. Roxana gave birth to Alexander IV in late 323 BC, formalizing the dual monarchy, though Arrhidaeus's limitations and the infant's vulnerability rendered the arrangement unstable from inception. The Partition of Babylon in mid-323 BC distributed Alexander's satrapies among the Diadochi to stabilize administration, but underlying ambitions and rivalries ensured its transience. Ptolemy received Egypt, Lysimachus Thrace, Leonnatus Hellespontine Phrygia (though he died soon after), Antipater retained Macedonia and Greece as strategos, Antigonus Phrygia and Lycia, while eastern satraps like Peithon in Media and Seleucus as keeper of the royal treasury were confirmed; Perdiccas controlled key military forces and the heirs. This settlement prioritized military balance over loyalty to the Argead dynasty, as satraps prioritized personal power amid Macedonian traditions of acclamation by the army and the lack of primogeniture. Roxana and the heirs were sidelined to Macedonia under Antipater's influence, fostering resentment among pro-Perdiccas factions. The Diadochi Wars erupted from 322 BC onward due to Perdiccas's centralizing efforts, which threatened satrapal autonomy, leading to a cascade of conflicts that fragmented the empire by 301 BC. The First War (322–320 BC) began with Perdiccas's failed invasion of Egypt against Ptolemy in 321 BC, where he drowned during a Nile crossing, prompting Antipater, Craterus, and Antigonus to ally against him; Eumenes defeated Craterus at the Battle of the Hellespont in April 320 BC, but the war ended with the Partition of Triparadisus, installing Antipater as regent and reassigning satrapies, including Seleucus to Babylonia. The Second War (319–315 BC) followed Antipater's death, pitting Cassander (his son) against Polyperchon (new regent), with Antigonus emerging dominant in Asia after defeating Eumenes at Gabiene in 316 BC; Cassander seized Macedonia, murdered Olympias in 316 BC, and held Philip III and Alexander IV as puppets. Subsequent wars solidified regional kingdoms: the Third (314–311 BC) saw Antigonus's coalition against Cassander, Lysimachus, and Ptolemy end in stalemate via the Peace of 311 BC, nominally recognizing the heirs; the Fourth (307–301 BC) culminated at Ipsus in 301 BC, where a coalition defeated and killed Antigonus, dividing his territories—Seleucus gained Syria and much of Asia, Lysimachus Asia Minor, and Ptolemy consolidated Egypt. By 317 BC, Cassander had executed Philip III, and in 310 or 309 BC, he and allies murdered Alexander IV and Roxana at Amphipolis to eliminate Argead claims, ending the dynasty. The wars' causal driver was the Diadochi's prioritization of hereditary satrapies over imperial unity, fueled by Macedonian martial culture and the vast, heterogeneous empire's administrative challenges, resulting in Hellenistic kingdoms: Ptolemaic Egypt, Seleucid Asia, Antigonid Macedonia, and Attalid Pergamum.

Legacy

Spread of Hellenism and Cultural Impacts

Alexander's conquests from 334 to 323 BCE facilitated the dissemination of Greek culture across a territory spanning from the Mediterranean to the Indus River, initiating the Hellenistic period upon his death in 323 BCE. His policies, including the mass weddings at Susa in 324 BCE—where he wed Stateira, daughter of Darius III, and arranged unions for 91 Macedonian companions with Persian nobility, while encouraging 10,000 soldiers to marry Asian women—aimed to integrate Greek and Eastern elites, though most such marriages dissolved after his death due to Macedonian resistance. This initiative, alongside the establishment of administrative centers modeled on Greek poleis, promoted the adoption of Greek governance, education (paideia), and urban planning in conquered regions. The successors (Diadochi) perpetuated this expansion through kingdoms like Ptolemaic Egypt and the Seleucid Empire, where Koine Greek emerged as the lingua franca by the late 4th century BCE, enabling trade, administration, and intellectual exchange across diverse populations. Hellenistic cities featured gymnasia, theaters, and agoras, institutions that disseminated Greek philosophical schools such as Stoicism, founded by Zeno of Citium around 300 BCE, and Epicureanism by Epicurus (341–270 BCE), shifting focus from classical city-state civic duty to individual ethics and cosmopolitanism. Cultural impacts manifested in syncretic fusions, evident in religion with deities like Serapis (combining Osiris and Zeus) under Ptolemy I in Egypt post-323 BCE, and in art through emotionally expressive sculptures like the Nike of Samothrace (c. 190 BCE). In the East, Greco-Bactrian kingdoms (c. 250–130 BCE) influenced Greco-Buddhist art in Gandhara from the 1st century BCE, blending Hellenistic realism—such as idealized anatomy and drapery—with Buddhist iconography, as seen in early bronze Buddha statues dated to the 1st–2nd centuries CE. Scientific advancements, centered in Alexandria's Mouseion and library (established c. 300 BCE, housing over 500,000 scrolls), included Euclid's Elements (c. 300 BCE) standardizing geometry and Eratosthenes' calculation of Earth's circumference (c. 240 BCE, accurate within 1% error). These developments fostered empirical inquiry but were enabled by elite patronage rather than broad societal diffusion, with Greek culture often overlaying rather than fully supplanting local traditions.

Founded Cities and Infrastructure

Alexander established settlements across his conquered territories primarily to anchor Macedonian control, house garrisons of veterans and mercenaries, and serve as hubs for Greek colonization, administration, and commerce. These foundations often involved delineating boundaries, appointing architects for orthogonal layouts influenced by Hippodamian principles, and integrating local populations with Hellenic settlers, though exact numbers remain debated due to varying ancient accounts and archaeological ambiguities. Arrian and Diodorus Siculus describe around nine explicit foundations, while Plutarch's estimate reaches seventy, likely including planned or successor-completed sites; modern analyses accept approximately ten to twenty directly attributable to Alexander before his death in 323 BC. The archetype was Alexandria ad Aegyptum, founded in November 331 BC on a narrow isthmus near the Canopic branch of the Nile, strategically positioned for Mediterranean trade and defense against Persian resurgence. Architect Deinocrates laid out its grid with broad avenues, a harbor, and acropolis, populating it with 10,000 initial settlers including Greeks and Jews; it rapidly grew into a cosmopolitan metropolis, though major monuments like the Pharos lighthouse were erected under the Ptolemies. Other key foundations included Alexandria in Ariane (near modern Herat, Afghanistan, circa 330 BC) to stabilize Bactria-Arachosia, Alexandria Eschate (Khujand, Tajikistan, 329 BC) as a frontier bulwark against Scythians on the Jaxartes River, and Alexandria in the Caucasus (likely near Kabul, 330 BC) for Arachosian security. In the east, Bucephala (on the Hydaspes in Punjab, Pakistan, 326 BC), named for his deceased horse, and Nicaea (nearby, commemorating victory over Porus) flanked river crossings, settling 17,000 colonists including camp followers. These urban projects extended to infrastructure enhancing connectivity and defense, such as harbors at Alexandria for naval power projection and fortified walls at outposts like Alexandria Eschate to deter nomads. During the siege of Tyre in 332 BC, engineers constructed a 750-meter causeway from the mainland using timber, rubble, and siege engines, permanently linking the island and reshaping the coastline despite Persian counter-efforts. Alexander's campaigns also featured temporary but influential works, including pontoon bridges over the Oxus (329 BC) and Hydaspes (326 BC) rivers—spanning up to 1,000 meters with boats, fascines, and rafts—to enable rapid army transit, which successors adapted for enduring trade routes. Such initiatives, blending Greek engineering with Persian precedents, facilitated the empire's logistical cohesion but relied heavily on local labor and resources, with longevity varying: Egyptian and Mesopotamian sites prospered, while some eastern foundations faded or relocated amid post-Alexander instability.

Influence on Rome and Later Empires

Roman generals and statesmen of the late Republic frequently emulated Alexander the Great as the archetype of victorious leadership and territorial expansion, drawing inspiration from his rapid conquests and personal valor to legitimize their own ambitions. Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus, or Pompey, explicitly modeled his eastern campaigns after Alexander's, incorporating Alexandrian imagery in his triumphs, such as dressing his soldiers in Macedonian-style cloaks and limiting overt emulation to the eastern provinces to avoid domestic backlash. Similarly, Marcus Licinius Crassus sought to replicate Alexander's Parthian successes by launching an expedition against the Parthians in 53 BCE, though it ended in disaster at Carrhae, underscoring the perils of such imitation without Alexander's tactical adaptability. Alexander's military doctrines, emphasizing combined arms, cavalry charges, and decisive battlefield maneuvers, influenced Roman strategic thinking, even as the manipular legion evolved distinct from the Macedonian phalanx to prioritize flexibility and reserves. This admiration extended to imperial ideology, where Alexander symbolized unbridled conquest and divine favor, motivating Roman expansion eastward into Hellenistic territories once under his sway, with generals like Pompey and later emperors measuring their achievements against his benchmark of empire-building from Greece to India. Subsequent Roman emperors perpetuated this reverence, integrating Alexandrian motifs into their self-presentation and policies, as seen in Trajan's Parthian campaigns and Caracalla's visit to Alexander's tomb in 215 CE, where he sought to invoke the conqueror's aura for his own legitimacy. The Byzantine Empire, as the Eastern Roman continuation, preserved Alexander's legacy through Greek cultural veneration, depicting him in manuscripts and frescoes as a heroic antecedent whose Hellenistic foundations underpinned imperial claims to universal rule, though direct policy emulation waned amid Christian reinterpretations. This enduring model reinforced Rome's conception of empire as a divinely ordained, expansive dominion, contrasting with more defensive orientations in other successor states.

Economic and Scientific Advancements

Alexander's conquests facilitated the integration of diverse economies through the standardization of coinage, adopting the Attic weight standard for silver tetradrachms and gold staters, which promoted uniformity in trade across his empire from Greece to India. This reform, initiated after the Persian campaigns around 330 BCE, standardized coinage and enabled the issuance of an estimated 60 million Alexander-type tetradrachms between approximately 333 and 290 BCE by Alexander and his successors (the Diadochi), primarily funded by looted Persian silver, to pay troops and stimulate local economies by circulating reliable currency. The influx of Persian gold and silver treasuries—such as the 120,000 talents seized from Susa and Persepolis in 331–330 BCE—flooded markets, reducing scarcity and enabling large-scale public works, military expenditures, and trade expansion without immediate inflationary collapse due to vast territorial revenues. His policies emphasized agricultural enhancement and infrastructure, introducing irrigation techniques and crop improvements in conquered regions like Mesopotamia and Bactria, which boosted food production and supported urban growth in newly founded cities such as Alexandria in Egypt (331 BCE), serving as hubs for commerce. These conquests reorganised and extended existing Persian trade networks, including the Royal Road, thereby linking the Mediterranean with Central Asia and India, fostering exchanges in spices, textiles, and metals; this prefigured the Silk Road by unifying disparate markets under Hellenistic oversight and reducing piracy through naval control. Tax reforms, including lighter burdens on Greek settlers and satrapal tributes recalibrated for efficiency, generated steady revenues—estimated at 15,000–20,000 talents annually post-Persia—while encouraging merchant migration and economic specialization. Scientifically, Alexander's campaigns advanced empirical knowledge by incorporating botanists, zoologists, and geographers into his expeditions, who documented flora, fauna, and terrains from the Nile to the Indus, sending specimens and reports back to Aristotle in Greece for classification. This systematic collection, beginning around 334 BCE during the Asian campaigns, expanded Hellenistic understanding of biodiversity and ecology, with records of numerous new plant species and exotic animals contributing to Aristotle's Historia Animalium. Expeditions dispatched in 332 BCE to investigate the Nile's flooding origins yielded hydrological insights, while surveys of the Euphrates and Indian Ocean coasts refined cartography, nearly doubling the known world's mapped extent by integrating Persian and local data with Greek methods. These efforts, driven by Alexander's directive for comprehensive observation rather than mere conquest, bridged Greek rationalism with Eastern empirical traditions, laying groundwork for Ptolemaic Alexandria's later library and museum as centers of synthesis.

Controversies and Criticisms

Atrocities and Massacres

Alexander's destruction of Thebes in 335 BCE served as a deterrent against Greek rebellion following his ascension. After Theban forces resisted Macedonian forces, Alexander's troops stormed the city, killing approximately 6,000 defenders in the assault. An additional 30,000 inhabitants, primarily non-combatants, were enslaved and sold, while the city itself was razed, with surviving structures auctioned off to neighboring Boeotians. Ancient accounts, such as Diodorus Siculus, attribute the severity to Alexander's intent to intimidate other poleis into submission, though the scale reflects standard Hellenistic punitive practices rather than unique excess. During the siege of Tyre in 332 BCE, which lasted seven months, Alexander's forces breached the island city's walls via a constructed causeway. Upon capture, troops massacred around 6,000 to 8,000 Tyrian defenders and inhabitants, with 2,000 survivors crucified along the shore as a warning. Approximately 30,000 others were enslaved, and the city was systematically destroyed, including its temples. This retribution stemmed from Tyre's refusal to surrender and its execution of pro-Macedonian envoys, aligning with ancient siege warfare norms where prolonged resistance invited total subjugation. The fall of Gaza in late 332 BCE involved similar ferocity after a two-month siege. Alexander, enraged by defender Batis's defiance—evidenced by Batis's refusal to surrender and mockery of Macedonian envoys—ordered the city's sack, resulting in heavy civilian and military casualties, though exact numbers are unrecorded in surviving sources. Batis himself was bound by the ankles to a chariot and dragged alive around the city walls in emulation of Achilles' treatment of Hector, a public execution symbolizing dominance over resistance. Such acts, while brutal, were tactical assertions of authority in a campaign where mercy was withheld to prevent further delays en route to Egypt. In 330 BCE, after capturing Persepolis, Alexander authorized the looting of its treasuries—estimated at vast sums transported by 5,000 camels and 20,000 mules—followed by the deliberate burning of the palace complex. Ancient historians like Arrian cite revenge for Xerxes' destruction of Athens in 480 BCE as justification, though Plutarch describes it as ensuing from a drunken banquet incited by the courtesan Thaïs. While not a direct massacre, the conflagration and prior sack caused deaths among guards and looters, with the symbolic eradication of Achaemenid ceremonial heartland underscoring punitive intent over mere conquest. Alexander's Indian campaigns from 326 BCE featured escalated violence, particularly against the Malli tribe. After sustaining a near-fatal arrow wound during the assault on a Mallian fortress, Alexander, believing himself dying, ordered the mass slaughter of all occupants in reprisal, resulting in the near-total extermination of the garrison and civilians within. Earlier, at Massaga, he executed 7,000 Indian mercenaries who refused integration into his army post-surrender, citing their potential as ongoing threats. These incidents, amid broader ravages against Aspasians and other tribes, reflect heightened brutality as supply lines stretched and resistance intensified, with ancient sources like Arrian noting the cumulative toll on local populations through massacre and enslavement.

Orientalization and Megalomania Claims

Alexander's adoption of Persian customs, often termed "Persianization" or orientalization, began notably after the conquest of Persia in 330 BC, when he retained Achaemenid administrative structures, including satrapies and tax systems, to maintain control over the vast empire rather than dismantling them entirely. This included wearing Persian royal diadem and tunics by 327 BC, participating in Persian-style hunts with local nobility, and integrating thousands of Persians into his Companion cavalry and hypaspists as a means of fusing elites from conquered territories with Macedonian forces. Critics, drawing from ancient sources like Quintus Curtius Rufus, have interpreted these shifts as evidence of Alexander succumbing to Eastern luxury and despotism, eroding his original Greek martial ethos and fostering alienation among his Macedonian troops, who viewed such practices as effeminate or servile. However, contemporary scholarship emphasizes these as pragmatic strategies for legitimacy in the eyes of subject peoples, where Persian kings were seen as semi-divine rulers, rather than personal indulgence or cultural capitulation. A focal point of orientalization claims centers on the proskynesis controversy in 327 BC at Bactra, where Alexander sought to introduce the Persian court ritual of prostration before the king, equating it to obeisance toward a god or sun. Macedonian officers, including Callisthenes the philosopher, resisted vehemently, perceiving it as an assault on Greek equality and a step toward tyranny, leading to Callisthenes' arrest and execution on conspiracy charges. Proponents of the orientalization thesis argue this reflected Alexander's growing detachment from Hellenistic norms, exacerbated by heavy drinking and isolation from peers, culminating in mutinies like that at Opis in 324 BC over Persian promotions. Yet, Arrian's account, based on Ptolemy and Aristobulus, portrays the policy as a calculated bid for cultural synthesis to unify the empire, abandoned partially after backlash, with no disruption to military efficacy. The mass weddings at Susa in 324 BC, uniting 80 Macedonian officers with Persian noblewomen including Alexander's marriage to Stateira, daughter of Darius III, further fueled accusations of enforced orientalism, though participants retained Greek wives and the unions aimed at dynastic stability. Megalomania allegations tie into claims of self-deification, amplified after Alexander's 331 BC visit to the Siwah Oasis oracle, where he was proclaimed son of Zeus-Ammon, prompting coinage depicting him with ram horns and temples dedicated in his honor across Greek cities by 324 BC. Ancient writers like Plutarch noted his encouragement of divine flattery, interpreting omens as personal endorsements and demanding proskynesis as befitting a god-king, which some modern interpreters, relying on these biased Roman-era sources, frame as hubris or psychological decline from unchecked power. Such views posit a progression from heroic ambition to delusion, evidenced by his oracle consultations and refusal of mortal tributes in favor of heroic ones. Counterarguments from historians highlight that deification served political utility in the East, where rulers like pharaohs embodied gods, and in Greece, where hero cults were normative; Alexander's policies yielded no strategic failures, and mutinies stemmed more from fatigue after 11 years of campaigning than his persona. Ancient sources' portrayals, often from post-conquest critics, exaggerate for moralistic effect, while archaeological evidence of continued Hellenistic foundations underscores deliberate cultural blending over mania.

Persian and Eastern Perspectives

In Zoroastrian Middle Persian texts such as the Bundahishn and Denkard, Alexander is vilified as gujastak ("the Accursed" or "the Evil One"), portrayed as a demonic figure who invaded Iran, massacred Zoroastrian priests (magi), and systematically destroyed the sacred Avesta scriptures by casting them into water, fire, and dung. These accounts, compiled centuries after his death (circa 9th-10th centuries CE but drawing on earlier oral traditions), attribute to him the near-extinction of Zoroastrian religious knowledge, with estimates suggesting up to 21 of the 24 original nasks (books) of the Avesta were lost, leaving only fragments preserved orally by fleeing priests. This hostility stems from causal events like the 330 BCE sack of Persepolis, where Alexander's forces burned the Achaemenid palaces—possibly in retaliation for Athens' earlier destruction by Xerxes, though Zoroastrian sources frame it as deliberate desecration of Iranian sacred sites. Contemporary Achaemenid Persian records, limited as they are due to the empire's administrative focus rather than historiographical tradition, likely viewed Alexander as a disruptive barbarian invader akin to earlier Scythian threats, emphasizing his violation of Persian royal customs, such as pursuing and desecrating the body of the wounded Darius III in 330 BCE rather than granting honorable surrender. Post-conquest Zoroastrian resentment persisted, with texts accusing him of scattering Iranian elites and replacing them with Greek satraps, eroding the empire's magian priesthood that had maintained religious continuity for over two centuries. By the Islamic era, Persian literary traditions underwent a transformation, integrating Alexander (Iskandar) into national epics as a semi-legendary hero. In Ferdowsi's Shahnameh (completed 1010 CE), he appears as the son of the Iranian king Nectanebo II (via magical conception) and half-brother to Darius III, legitimizing his rule as an internal succession rather than foreign conquest; Iskandar quests for the Water of Life, defeats demons, and governs justly, embodying Persian ideals of wise monarchy while avenging his "father's" death. This portrayal aligns with Syriac and Arabic Alexander Romances, influenced by Quranic depiction of Dhul-Qarnayn (possibly Alexander) as a righteous conqueror building a wall against Gog and Magog (Surah 18:83-98), reflecting a pragmatic assimilation to preserve cultural narratives under successive empires. Eastern perspectives beyond Persia, particularly Indian, show scant contemporary acknowledgment of Alexander's 326 BCE incursion across the Hydaspes River, where he defeated King Porus (Paurava) in battle on May 326 BCE but suffered heavy casualties (estimated 1,000-4,000 Macedonian dead) amid monsoon conditions and war elephant charges. Indian sources like the Puranas vaguely reference "Yavana" (Greek) incursions by kings like Mura or Sandrokottos (Chandragupta Maurya, post-321 BCE), but omit Alexander specifically, suggesting his campaign registered minimally against the subcontinent's vast polities, including the Nanda Empire he never reached due to troop mutiny at the Hyphasis River in 326 BCE. Later Indian traditions, including some modern nationalist interpretations, mythologize Porus as repelling the invader decisively, framing Alexander's withdrawal as defeat and his empire's footprint as ephemeral, with no enduring cultural or political imprint comparable to Persian integration. In Central Asian contexts, such as Bactria and Sogdia (conquered 329-327 BCE), local views reconstructed from archaeological and later accounts depict Alexander as a formidable but alien conqueror who suppressed revolts brutally—e.g., the 329 BCE massacre at Marakanda (Samarkand), where 120,000 Sogdians were reportedly sold into slavery—yet founded hybrid cities like Alexandria Eschate ("the Farthest," modern Khujand, 328 BCE) blending Greek and local irrigation systems. Greco-Bactrian kingdoms emerging post-323 BCE perpetuated some Hellenic elements, but indigenous traditions, echoed in later Silk Road lore, emphasized resistance figures like Oxyartes (father-in-law to Alexander) and viewed the Macedonians as transient disruptors before Mauryan and Parthian resurgence.

Historiography

Ancient Sources and Reliability

The principal surviving ancient accounts of Alexander the Great derive from five main authors who wrote between the late 1st century BC and the 2nd century AD, drawing on earlier, largely lost works by eyewitnesses and contemporaries. These include Arrian's Anabasis Alexandri (c. 150 AD), Plutarch's Life of Alexander (c. 100-120 AD), Diodorus Siculus' Bibliotheca historica (c. 60-30 BC), Quintus Curtius Rufus' Historiae Alexandri Magni (c. 41-54 AD), and Justin's Epitome of Pompeius Trogus (c. 2nd-3rd century AD). No complete contemporary histories survive intact, as primary sources such as those by Alexander's generals Ptolemy I and Aristobulus, or the court historian Callisthenes, exist only in fragments or as embedded quotations in later texts. Arrian's work is widely assessed as the most reliable among the extant narratives, as he explicitly prioritized eyewitness testimonies from Ptolemy, a general who became pharaoh of Egypt and authored a factual campaign history to bolster his own legitimacy, and Aristobulus, an engineer who accompanied Alexander and produced a generally trustworthy but occasionally flattering account in his old age. Arrian modeled his history on Xenophon's Anabasis, aiming for military precision and omitting sensational elements found in popular romances, though he acknowledged the challenge of reconciling conflicting reports on distances, troop numbers, and motivations. Ptolemy's omissions of his own errors and Aristobulus' tendency to rationalize Alexander's decisions introduce biases favoring the king's strategic genius, yet cross-verification with archaeological data, such as battle sites and inscriptions, often aligns with Arrian's details on events like the Battle of Gaugamela in 331 BC, where Alexander's 47,000 troops defeated Darius III's larger force. Plutarch's biography emphasizes Alexander's moral character and virtues, drawing from a broad array of sources including some anti-Macedonian Greek writers, but he selectively highlighted anecdotes to illustrate ethical lessons, such as Alexander's temper or clemency, while warning readers of the unreliability of earlier accounts tainted by flattery or envy. Diodorus relied heavily on Cleitarchus, a 3rd-century BC historian whose dramatic style prioritized entertainment over accuracy, leading to inflated figures like 100,000 casualties at Tyre in 332 BC and inclusion of unverified prodigies. Quintus Curtius Rufus, writing under Roman emperors, infused rhetorical flourish and moralizing, with gaps in his text and a focus on Alexander's decline, reflecting Roman anxieties about unchecked ambition rather than strict chronology. Justin's epitome condenses Trogus' lost 1st-century BC work, preserving some unique details but abbreviating events and amplifying sensationalism, such as exaggerated eastern barbarism. Reliability across these sources is compromised by their dependence on partisan originals: pro-Alexander accounts like Ptolemy's suppressed logistical failures, such as supply shortages during the Indian campaigns of 326 BC, while vulgar historians like Cleitarchus catered to Hellenistic audiences with mythic embellishments, including divine omens and superhuman feats. Callisthenes' official history, cut short by his execution in 327 BC for opposing proskynesis, provided early narratives but was biased toward royal propaganda. Other lost eyewitnesses, including admiral Nearchus and admiral-turned-philosopher Onesicritus, contributed navigational and philosophical details but with self-aggrandizing tendencies. Modern reconstructions thus triangulate these texts against numismatic evidence, Babylonian chronicles recording events like the fall of Persepolis in 330 BC, and geographical consistencies to filter legendary accretions, revealing a core of verifiable conquests from Greece to India spanning 334-323 BC.

Modern Scholarship and Recent Discoveries

Modern scholarship emphasizes the fragmentary nature of ancient sources on Alexander the Great, which primarily stem from later Roman-era historians like Arrian, Plutarch, and Diodorus Siculus, who drew upon lost contemporary accounts such as those by Callisthenes and Cleitarchus. These texts, often sensationalized or biased toward Greek perspectives, have prompted 20th- and 21st-century historians to adopt a skeptical approach, cross-referencing with Babylonian astronomical diaries, Persian inscriptions, and numismatic evidence to reconstruct events. For instance, Edward M. Anson highlights how interpretations range from Alexander as a heroic world-conqueror to a megalomaniacal figure whose successes owed much to inherited Macedonian military reforms under Philip II, though empirical data from battle sites like Issus and Gaugamela confirm his tactical innovations in combined arms warfare. Debates persist over Alexander's administrative policies and cultural impacts, with scholars like Krzysztof Nawotka arguing that his fusion of Persian and Macedonian elements—such as adopting proskynesis and mass weddings at Susa—was pragmatic realpolitik to stabilize rule rather than genuine orientalization, supported by evidence of continued Greek dominance in satrapies post-conquest. Critics, however, point to source biases favoring elite Greek viewpoints, potentially understating resistance from subject peoples, as inferred from fragmented Indian and Central Asian records. Genetic and linguistic studies of Hellenistic-era artifacts further suggest limited long-term demographic mixing, challenging narratives of profound Hellenization beyond urban elites. Recent archaeological discoveries have provided empirical anchors amid these historiographical uncertainties. Excavations in Vergina, Greece, analyzed in 2025, revealed that Tomb I (Tomb of Persephone)—long attributed to Philip II—contains remains of a man aged 25–35 years old and a young female, both buried in the first half of the 4th century BCE, along with infant remains dating to 150 BCE–130 CE centuries later, with osteological mismatches to Philip's known injuries from sources like Diodorus; the identification with Philip II, Cleopatra, and their newborn is not scientifically sustainable, thus questioning traditional royal tomb identifications and prompting reevaluation of Macedonian burial practices. In North Macedonia, the 2025 unearthing of a Bronze Age-to-Hellenistic site that may be the capital of Lyncestis yielded a silver coin minted circa 325-323 BCE during Alexander's lifetime, alongside axes and pottery linking it to the Lynkestis region, which may have been the birthplace of Eurydice I, Alexander's paternal grandmother, offering potential material evidence for his familial power base. Ongoing digs in Alexandria, Egypt, including a 2025 structure possibly tied to Ptolemaic commemorations, continue the quest for Alexander's tomb, though no definitive find has emerged, underscoring the challenges of urban overbuild and historical looting described in ancient texts. These findings, while incremental, bolster causal analyses of Alexander's campaigns by verifying logistical feats, such as supply lines evidenced in Babylonian cuneiform tablets recording his 331 BCE occupation of Babylon.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.